Abstract 2489: The new approach for measuring nonuniformity of read coverages reveals the quality of RNA-seq data

Abstract High-quality RNA is crucial for obtaining reliable RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data, with metrics like RNA Integrity Number (RIN). However, these metrics, while effective for evaluating RNA integrity, do not always correlate with RNA-seq data quality, especially at the transcript level. This gap is particularly evident in total RNA-seq, where existing measures such as the coefficient of variation (CV) for read coverage fail to fully capture data quality and are influenced by confounding factors like read coverage depth. To address this, we developed a novel method to assess RNA-seq data quality by quantifying nonuniformity in read coverage while minimizing the influence of read coverage depth. In this study we invented new matric called windowCV (wCV) and applied to a diverse range of RNA-seq datasets, including fresh frozen (FF) and FFPE total RNA-seq data, as well as poly(A)-enriched mRNA-seq data. In mRNA-seq, our method captured 3' read coverage bias, a hallmark of RNA degradation, particularly in longer transcripts. For total RNA-seq data, we identified noisy coverage patterns associated with poor data quality, even in samples with high RIN values. By fitting regression lines between wCV and mean coverage depth (MCD) and calculating the area under the curve (wCVAUC), we refined the assessment to account for RNA quality variability. Using the TCGA pilot study and our own datasets, we demonstrated that wCVAUC reliably identified low quality RNA-seq data and highlighted its impact on downstream analyses, including gene expression quantification and clustering. Importantly, we observed that low RIN values do not always predict poor RNA-seq data quality, as some samples with RIN values below 7 exhibited high-quality RNA-seq data based on wCVAUC. It means that our analyses showed that wCVAUC effectively distinguished high-quality from low-quality samples, including cases where traditional metrics like RIN and CV were insufficient. Additionally, our investigation into the relationships between nonuniformity of read coverage, exon GC content, and RNA localization revealed that the transcript-level RNA-seq data quality of lncRNA genes in FFPE samples is influenced by low exon GC content and nuclear localization. In conclusion, our method provides robust, transcript-level metrics for assessing RNA-seq data quality across platforms, enabling more accurate identification of low-quality data and minimizing biases in downstream analyses. This approach offers a new standard for integrating RNA-seq data quality with sample variability, particularly for challenging datasets such as FFPE and total RNA-seq. Citation Format: Wonyoung Choi, Miyeon Yeon, Jay Lee, Hyo Young Choi, David Neil Hayes. The new approach for measuring nonuniformity of read coverages reveals the quality of RNA-seq data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2489.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-2489
Primary Topic
Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 2489: The new approach for measuring nonuniformity of read coverages reveals the quality of RNA-seq data

Hyo Young Choi, Miyeon Yeon, Won-Young Choi, D. Neil Hayes et al.
Cancer Research
Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
article

Abstract 2489: The new approach for measuring nonuniformity of read coverages reveals the quality of RNA-seq data

Hyo Young Choi, Miyeon Yeon, Won-Young Choi, D. Neil Hayes, Jay H. Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract High-quality RNA is crucial for obtaining reliable RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data, with metrics like RNA Integrity Number (RIN). However, these metrics, while effective for evaluating RNA integrity, do not always correlate with RNA-seq data quality, especially at the transcript level. This gap is particularly evident in total RNA-seq, where existing measures such as the coefficient of variation (CV) for read coverage fail to fully capture data quality and are influenced by confounding factors like read coverage depth. To address this, we developed a novel method to assess RNA-seq data quality by quantifying nonuniformity in read coverage while minimizing the influence of read coverage depth. In this study we invented new matric called windowCV (wCV) and applied to a diverse range of RNA-seq datasets, including fresh frozen (FF) and FFPE total RNA-seq data, as well as poly(A)-enriched mRNA-seq data. In mRNA-seq, our method captured 3' read coverage bias, a hallmark of RNA degradation, particularly in longer transcripts. For total RNA-seq data, we identified noisy coverage patterns associated with poor data quality, even in samples with high RIN values. By fitting regression lines between wCV and mean coverage depth (MCD) and calculating the area under the curve (wCVAUC), we refined the assessment to account for RNA quality variability. Using the TCGA pilot study and our own datasets, we demonstrated that wCVAUC reliably identified low quality RNA-seq data and highlighted its impact on downstream analyses, including gene expression quantification and clustering. Importantly, we observed that low RIN values do not always predict poor RNA-seq data quality, as some samples with RIN values below 7 exhibited high-quality RNA-seq data based on wCVAUC. It means that our analyses showed that wCVAUC effectively distinguished high-quality from low-quality samples, including cases where traditional metrics like RIN and CV were insufficient. Additionally, our investigation into the relationships between nonuniformity of read coverage, exon GC content, and RNA localization revealed that the transcript-level RNA-seq data quality of lncRNA genes in FFPE samples is influenced by low exon GC content and nuclear localization. In conclusion, our method provides robust, transcript-level metrics for assessing RNA-seq data quality across platforms, enabling more accurate identification of low-quality data and minimizing biases in downstream analyses. This approach offers a new standard for integrating RNA-seq data quality with sample variability, particularly for challenging datasets such as FFPE and total RNA-seq. Citation Format: Wonyoung Choi, Miyeon Yeon, Jay Lee, Hyo Young Choi, David Neil Hayes. The new approach for measuring nonuniformity of read coverages reveals the quality of RNA-seq data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2489.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.