Is TOPCon ready for EVA? Insights from damp heat testing of glass-backsheet modules

Tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) technology currently dominates the photovoltaic market, and the industry is now focused on enhancing their cost-effectiveness while ensuring their durability in harsher environments. TOPCon modules commonly use a glass–glass bill of materials that incorporates polyolefin elastomer and co-extruded polyethylene encapsulants. Though, for cost and weight reduction, the use of polymer backsheets and lower-cost encapsulants is appealing. This study investigates the performance of glass-backsheet (G-B) TOPCon modules fabricated with two types of silver/aluminum (Ag/Al) pastes: conventional firing with standard Ag/Al paste and low-Al-content Ag paste combined with laser-assisted firing (LAF). The modules, encapsulated with ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), were subjected to damp-heat testing. Our findings indicate that solar cells with Ag/Al paste exhibit lower stability compared to low Al-content Ag paste; however, acid-rich moisture conditions contribute to glass-frit failures in both types of pastes. Additionally, the rear-side metal contacts, particularly those containing tellurium (Te) compounds, are susceptible to degradation in such environments. Based on these degradation mechanisms, we conclude that further investigation is required to allow for the wider adoption of EVA in TOPCon modules, particularly when a polymer backsheet is used. Ongoing research is essential to optimize these materials and enhance the cost-effectiveness and reliability of TOPCon technology for future applications. • EVA-based GB TOPCon modules with Ag/Al paste lost ∼37% power after 1,000h DH, mainly from FF degradation. • Using low-Al Ag paste with LAF cut power loss to ∼6.2% after 1,000h DH, showing improved thermal stability. • Front-side failure was due to Al oxidation and frit corrosion; rear-side failure involved Te compound breakdown. • Acetic acid from EVA hydrolysis accelerated contact corrosion and delamination at both front and rear interfaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113650
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is TOPCon ready for EVA? Insights from damp heat testing of glass-backsheet modules

Yajie Jiang, Xinyuan Wu, Bram Hoex, Jiexi Fu et al.
5 citations
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Planetary Science and Exploration
5.77
article

Is TOPCon ready for EVA? Insights from damp heat testing of glass-backsheet modules

Yajie Jiang, Xinyuan Wu, Bram Hoex, Jiexi Fu, Feng Li, Yan Zhang, Wu Wei, Xutao Wang, Weiguang Yang, J. L. Li, Lin Lv
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) technology currently dominates the photovoltaic market, and the industry is now focused on enhancing their cost-effectiveness while ensuring their durability in harsher environments. TOPCon modules commonly use a glass–glass bill of materials that incorporates polyolefin elastomer and co-extruded polyethylene encapsulants. Though, for cost and weight reduction, the use of polymer backsheets and lower-cost encapsulants is appealing. This study investigates the performance of glass-backsheet (G-B) TOPCon modules fabricated with two types of silver/aluminum (Ag/Al) pastes: conventional firing with standard Ag/Al paste and low-Al-content Ag paste combined with laser-assisted firing (LAF). The modules, encapsulated with ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), were subjected to damp-heat testing. Our findings indicate that solar cells with Ag/Al paste exhibit lower stability compared to low Al-content Ag paste; however, acid-rich moisture conditions contribute to glass-frit failures in both types of pastes. Additionally, the rear-side metal contacts, particularly those containing tellurium (Te) compounds, are susceptible to degradation in such environments. Based on these degradation mechanisms, we conclude that further investigation is required to allow for the wider adoption of EVA in TOPCon modules, particularly when a polymer backsheet is used. Ongoing research is essential to optimize these materials and enhance the cost-effectiveness and reliability of TOPCon technology for future applications. • EVA-based GB TOPCon modules with Ag/Al paste lost ∼37% power after 1,000h DH, mainly from FF degradation. • Using low-Al Ag paste with LAF cut power loss to ∼6.2% after 1,000h DH, showing improved thermal stability. • Front-side failure was due to Al oxidation and frit corrosion; rear-side failure involved Te compound breakdown. • Acetic acid from EVA hydrolysis accelerated contact corrosion and delamination at both front and rear interfaces.

Solar Energy Materials and Solar CellsVol. 288
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Australian Centre for Advanced Photovoltaics, University of Newcastle Australia, University of New South Wales, Australian Renewable Energy Agency
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Planetary Science and Exploration
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.