Translation, Linguistic Validation, and Reliability of the CLEFT-Q in a German Context

The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the CLEFT-Q questionnaire into German and evaluate its reliability as an instrument for Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). The translation followed the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines. Applicability was tested through cognitive debriefings with 7 patients. Adjustments were made during the process to achieve a conceptually equivalent translation. Reliability was assessed by conducting retest interviews with 50 patients at 4-week intervals. Translation challenges included difficulties in 8.4% of items during forward translation, 31.1% of items when comparing the 2 forward translations, and 10.1% of items during back-translation review. Cognitive debriefings revealed comprehension issues with 4 items (3.4%). Internal consistency and stability were evaluated using Cronbach alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient, both yielding values of 0.909, considered excellent. PROMs play a growing role in quality assurance for medical care. The CLEFT-Q is currently the only international tool specifically available for cleft lip and palate patients. Its German translation provides a reliable and valid instrument to assess outcomes in German-speaking regions, covering key aspects of patient experience, including satisfaction, functional outcomes, and health-related quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000011340
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation, Linguistic Validation, and Reliability of the CLEFT-Q in a German Context

Anna-Lisa Oechsle, Christina Weismann, Andreas Naros, Christian Friedrich Poets et al.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Translation, Linguistic Validation, and Reliability of the CLEFT-Q in a German Context

Anna-Lisa Oechsle, Christina Weismann, Andreas Naros, Christian Friedrich Poets, Anthony Valentin, Michael Krimmel, Lea Longerich
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the CLEFT-Q questionnaire into German and evaluate its reliability as an instrument for Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). The translation followed the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines. Applicability was tested through cognitive debriefings with 7 patients. Adjustments were made during the process to achieve a conceptually equivalent translation. Reliability was assessed by conducting retest interviews with 50 patients at 4-week intervals. Translation challenges included difficulties in 8.4% of items during forward translation, 31.1% of items when comparing the 2 forward translations, and 10.1% of items during back-translation review. Cognitive debriefings revealed comprehension issues with 4 items (3.4%). Internal consistency and stability were evaluated using Cronbach alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient, both yielding values of 0.909, considered excellent. PROMs play a growing role in quality assurance for medical care. The CLEFT-Q is currently the only international tool specifically available for cleft lip and palate patients. Its German translation provides a reliable and valid instrument to assess outcomes in German-speaking regions, covering key aspects of patient experience, including satisfaction, functional outcomes, and health-related quality of life.

Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryVol. 36(8)
University of Tübingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.