Probabilistic assessment of seismic acceleration demands of ductile light NSCs in moderately ductile RC frame buildings

This study investigates how the seismic demands of non-structural components (NSCs) are influenced by both their attachment ductility and the nonlinear behavior of supporting structures. The research focuses on acceleration demands at various building elevations and evaluates component damage states according to Hazus guidelines. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) was applied to evaluate both linear and nonlinear structural responses of four archetype reinforced concrete moment-resisting frame buildings. Ground motions, consisting of historical and synthetic records, were scaled to match Montreal’s uniform hazard spectrum for Site Class 'C' with a 2 % probability of exceedance per 50 years. NSC responses were assessed using an uncoupled analysis approach, implemented through iterative Newmark integration. Key findings demonstrate that increasing the ductility of NSC attachments reduces their acceleration demands by up to 140 % in elastic structures. When accounting for structural nonlinearity, acceleration demands decrease by 110 %, highlighting the conservative nature of elastic analysis assumptions commonly used in current design practices. These reductions are most pronounced for components with periods corresponding to the structure's fundamental mode, with the effect diminishing for higher modes. The research provides practical design implications by quantifying the relationship between attachment ductility, structural behavior, and component damage thresholds. The results indicate that a moderately ductile (μ≈1.5) NSC attachment provides optimal performance benefits while minimizing the risk of NSC damage, offering valuable insights for the performance-based design of NSCs. • Iterative Newmark approach to simulate ductility of NSCs for fragility analysis. • Higher periods of NSCs show less damage risk as the performance of NSCs enhances. • Structural nonlinearity enhances the performance of NSCs in all damage states. • NSCs show higher vulnerability at elevated building levels, especially at the roof. • Higher ductility of NSCs improves energy dissipation but raises damage risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Structures
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120347
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probabilistic assessment of seismic acceleration demands of ductile light NSCs in moderately ductile RC frame buildings

Rola Assi, Majid Mehrjoo
1 citations
Engineering Structures
Seismic Performance and Analysis
0.95
article

Probabilistic assessment of seismic acceleration demands of ductile light NSCs in moderately ductile RC frame buildings

Rola Assi, Majid Mehrjoo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates how the seismic demands of non-structural components (NSCs) are influenced by both their attachment ductility and the nonlinear behavior of supporting structures. The research focuses on acceleration demands at various building elevations and evaluates component damage states according to Hazus guidelines. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) was applied to evaluate both linear and nonlinear structural responses of four archetype reinforced concrete moment-resisting frame buildings. Ground motions, consisting of historical and synthetic records, were scaled to match Montreal’s uniform hazard spectrum for Site Class 'C' with a 2 % probability of exceedance per 50 years. NSC responses were assessed using an uncoupled analysis approach, implemented through iterative Newmark integration. Key findings demonstrate that increasing the ductility of NSC attachments reduces their acceleration demands by up to 140 % in elastic structures. When accounting for structural nonlinearity, acceleration demands decrease by 110 %, highlighting the conservative nature of elastic analysis assumptions commonly used in current design practices. These reductions are most pronounced for components with periods corresponding to the structure's fundamental mode, with the effect diminishing for higher modes. The research provides practical design implications by quantifying the relationship between attachment ductility, structural behavior, and component damage thresholds. The results indicate that a moderately ductile (μ≈1.5) NSC attachment provides optimal performance benefits while minimizing the risk of NSC damage, offering valuable insights for the performance-based design of NSCs. • Iterative Newmark approach to simulate ductility of NSCs for fragility analysis. • Higher periods of NSCs show less damage risk as the performance of NSCs enhances. • Structural nonlinearity enhances the performance of NSCs in all damage states. • NSCs show higher vulnerability at elevated building levels, especially at the roof. • Higher ductility of NSCs improves energy dissipation but raises damage risk.

Engineering StructuresVol. 335
École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.