The era of digital mental health interventions: we know they can be effective but are they also safe?

Over the past two decades, digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have seen a surge in studies with people experiencing mental ill-health, whether this be via web-based platforms, smartphone applications, text messages or other digital devices. Although DMHIs already demonstrate evidence of their acceptability and some of their effectiveness among different populations, the information about their safety is less clear. This Editorial reflects on a Delphi study by Taher and colleagues that explored the regulation of DMHIs and generated ten safety recommendations. We discuss these recommendations in the context of existing relevant literature and provide suggestions for further steps to advance research and policy on DMHIs in the UK and globally. Further dialog is needed, including the views and experiences of all key stakeholders, and particularly of people with lived experience, to ensure DMHIs are not only an acceptable and potentially effective treatment approach, but also safe for those that use them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJPsych Open
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.42
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Psychiatric care and mental health services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The era of digital mental health interventions: we know they can be effective but are they also safe?

Urška Arnautovska, Alyssa Milton
3 citations
BJPsych Open
Psychiatric care and mental health services
6.92
article

The era of digital mental health interventions: we know they can be effective but are they also safe?

Urška Arnautovska, Alyssa Milton
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Over the past two decades, digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have seen a surge in studies with people experiencing mental ill-health, whether this be via web-based platforms, smartphone applications, text messages or other digital devices. Although DMHIs already demonstrate evidence of their acceptability and some of their effectiveness among different populations, the information about their safety is less clear. This Editorial reflects on a Delphi study by Taher and colleagues that explored the regulation of DMHIs and generated ten safety recommendations. We discuss these recommendations in the context of existing relevant literature and provide suggestions for further steps to advance research and policy on DMHIs in the UK and globally. Further dialog is needed, including the views and experiences of all key stakeholders, and particularly of people with lived experience, to ensure DMHIs are not only an acceptable and potentially effective treatment approach, but also safe for those that use them.

BJPsych OpenVol. 11(3)
The University of Sydney (AU), Australian Research Council (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Metro South Health (AU), Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course (AU)
Australian Government, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Psychiatric care and mental health services
6.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.