Translating Genocide, the Politics of Memory, and (In)Commensurabilities in Post-conflict Cambodia

This article examines the multiple translations of 'genocide' in Cambodia as prolai pouch-sas since the end of the Khmer Rouge Regime. It traces the term's double meaning from the authoritarian People's Republic of Kampuchea's (PRK) 1980s Khmer translation as the annihilation of the Cambodian nation, to the ECCC's international legal translation as the annihilation of difference in the 2000s. The PRK translation differed from the international legal concept but resonated with the experiences of the majority of the Cambodian population who picked it up and vernacularised the term. The ECCC translation was rejected by many Cambodians and could not transcend the legal proceedings of the tribunal. Consequently, genocide is now a word with a double meaning appearing in different political and legal locales and settings. This duplicity became part of contestations between liberal and illiberal peacebuilding and transitional justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2025.2485964
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cambodian History and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translating Genocide, the Politics of Memory, and (In)Commensurabilities in Post-conflict Cambodia

Duong Keo, Sina Emde
2 citations
The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology
Cambodian History and Society
8.40
article

Translating Genocide, the Politics of Memory, and (In)Commensurabilities in Post-conflict Cambodia

Duong Keo, Sina Emde
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article examines the multiple translations of 'genocide' in Cambodia as prolai pouch-sas since the end of the Khmer Rouge Regime. It traces the term's double meaning from the authoritarian People's Republic of Kampuchea's (PRK) 1980s Khmer translation as the annihilation of the Cambodian nation, to the ECCC's international legal translation as the annihilation of difference in the 2000s. The PRK translation differed from the international legal concept but resonated with the experiences of the majority of the Cambodian population who picked it up and vernacularised the term. The ECCC translation was rejected by many Cambodians and could not transcend the legal proceedings of the tribunal. Consequently, genocide is now a word with a double meaning appearing in different political and legal locales and settings. This duplicity became part of contestations between liberal and illiberal peacebuilding and transitional justice.

The Asia Pacific Journal of AnthropologyVol. 26(2)
Universidad Iberoamericana (DO), Leipzig University (DE)
Gerda Henkel Foundation, Freie Universität Berlin, Universität Leipzig
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cambodian History and Society
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.