Biodiversity finance: Sovereign biodiversity loss drivers and financial stability

Abstract This study analyzed the impact of sovereign biodiversity risk drivers on financial stability. Using a global dataset covering 2004–2021, I found empirical evidence that the biodiversity risks land use, drought, and freshwater stocks significantly affect the systemic risk measures SRISK and systemic expected shortfall (SES). This study also found empirical evidence that including non‐financial risks in banks' risk assessments is beneficial for financial stability because lending makes borrowers more aware of sustainability. By providing empirical findings on the influence of country‐specific biodiversity risk drivers on market‐based systemic risk measures, this study provides suggestions for a stronger consideration of biodiversity risks in the risk management of banks by regulators and central banks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.70017
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biodiversity finance: Sovereign biodiversity loss drivers and financial stability

Michael Mies
8 citations
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
8.84
article

Biodiversity finance: Sovereign biodiversity loss drivers and financial stability

Michael Mies
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study analyzed the impact of sovereign biodiversity risk drivers on financial stability. Using a global dataset covering 2004–2021, I found empirical evidence that the biodiversity risks land use, drought, and freshwater stocks significantly affect the systemic risk measures SRISK and systemic expected shortfall (SES). This study also found empirical evidence that including non‐financial risks in banks' risk assessments is beneficial for financial stability because lending makes borrowers more aware of sustainability. By providing empirical findings on the influence of country‐specific biodiversity risk drivers on market‐based systemic risk measures, this study provides suggestions for a stronger consideration of biodiversity risks in the risk management of banks by regulators and central banks.

Journal of Industrial EcologyVol. 29(3)
University of Siegen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
8.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.