The subject, the worker, and the slave reification, capitalism, and the divestment of reason from freedom

This article traces a line of thought through a reading of Lukács to suggest that the promise of Enlightenment modernity to emancipate thought from extrahuman authority is an impossibility because the problem of sovereignty returns in the form of the problem of freedom. The authority to make ourselves responsible, and act according to norms of our own making is the keystone feature of philosophical modernity. But this capacity to self-determine requires that the normative compels itself alone. This is a central problem for social pragmatism, which claims heir to Kant and Hegel’s enlightenment. Lukács exacerbates this, pointing both to how capitalism enmeshes us within its sociomaterial systems and how this foregrounds worker’s practical enactment within those systems. This casts doubt on the possibility of detangling norms from power required for autonomy. But rather than follow this line of thought, Lukács foregrounds the split subjectivity of the worker as the material limit of determination. Instead, in confrontation not with the figure of the worker but the slave as reified and naturalised category we might disarticulate reason from freedom in pursuit of the immanent disentangling of thought from the problems of sovereign authority that modernity promised.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Social Criticism
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537251336727
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The subject, the worker, and the slave reification, capitalism, and the divestment of reason from freedom

James Trafford
Philosophy & Social Criticism
Political Economy and Marxism
article

The subject, the worker, and the slave reification, capitalism, and the divestment of reason from freedom

James Trafford
article en

Abstract

This article traces a line of thought through a reading of Lukács to suggest that the promise of Enlightenment modernity to emancipate thought from extrahuman authority is an impossibility because the problem of sovereignty returns in the form of the problem of freedom. The authority to make ourselves responsible, and act according to norms of our own making is the keystone feature of philosophical modernity. But this capacity to self-determine requires that the normative compels itself alone. This is a central problem for social pragmatism, which claims heir to Kant and Hegel’s enlightenment. Lukács exacerbates this, pointing both to how capitalism enmeshes us within its sociomaterial systems and how this foregrounds worker’s practical enactment within those systems. This casts doubt on the possibility of detangling norms from power required for autonomy. But rather than follow this line of thought, Lukács foregrounds the split subjectivity of the worker as the material limit of determination. Instead, in confrontation not with the figure of the worker but the slave as reified and naturalised category we might disarticulate reason from freedom in pursuit of the immanent disentangling of thought from the problems of sovereign authority that modernity promised.

Philosophy & Social Criticism
University for the Creative Arts (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.