Lattice gradient flows (de-)stabilizing topological sectors

A bstract We investigate the stability of topological charge under gradient flow taking the admissibility condition into account. For the SU(2) Wilson gauge theory with β = 2 . 45 and L 4 = 12 4 , we numerically show that the gradient flows with the Iwasaki and DBW2 gauge actions stabilize the topological sectors significantly, and they have qualitatively different behaviors compared with the Wilson and tree-level Symanzik flows. By considering the classical continuum limit of the flow actions, we discuss that the coefficient of dimension-6 operators has to be positive for stabilizing the one-instanton configuration, and the Iwasaki and DBW2 actions satisfy this criterion while the Wilson and Symanzik actions do not. Moreover, we observe that the DBW2 flow stabilizes the topological sectors at the very early stage of the flow ( $$ \hat{t} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>̂</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:math> ≈ 0 . 5–1), suggesting that a further systematic investigation of the DBW2 flow is warranted to confirm its computational efficiency in determining the gauge topology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep04(2025)123
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lattice gradient flows (de-)stabilizing topological sectors

Yuya Tanizaki, Akio Tomiya, Hiromasa Watanabe
2 citations
Journal of High Energy Physics
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
3.74
article

Lattice gradient flows (de-)stabilizing topological sectors

Yuya Tanizaki, Akio Tomiya, Hiromasa Watanabe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A bstract We investigate the stability of topological charge under gradient flow taking the admissibility condition into account. For the SU(2) Wilson gauge theory with β = 2 . 45 and L 4 = 12 4 , we numerically show that the gradient flows with the Iwasaki and DBW2 gauge actions stabilize the topological sectors significantly, and they have qualitatively different behaviors compared with the Wilson and tree-level Symanzik flows. By considering the classical continuum limit of the flow actions, we discuss that the coefficient of dimension-6 operators has to be positive for stabilizing the one-instanton configuration, and the Iwasaki and DBW2 actions satisfy this criterion while the Wilson and Symanzik actions do not. Moreover, we observe that the DBW2 flow stabilizes the topological sectors at the very early stage of the flow ( $$ \hat{t} $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>̂</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:math> ≈ 0 . 5–1), suggesting that a further systematic investigation of the DBW2 flow is warranted to confirm its computational efficiency in determining the gauge topology.

Journal of High Energy PhysicsVol. 2025(4)
Tokyo Woman's Christian University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), RIKEN Center for Computational Science (JP)
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba, Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
3.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lattice gradient flows (de-)stabilizing topological sectors — Yuya Tanizaki, Akio Tomiya, et al. · Journal of High Energy Physics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS