Disruptor or enabler? AI and financial system stability

Purpose The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) tools signifies a major advancement in technology, poised to significantly influence the financial system. From a conceptual standpoint, AI introduces both advantages and challenges to the financial landscape. Thus, this study aims to examine the dynamics between AI and financial system stability through several distinct approaches. Initially, the authors investigate potential nonlinearities in this relationship to assess the asymmetric reactions of financial system stability to the application of AI, both positive and negative. Design/methodology/approach Subsequently, to address intra-country variations, the authors incorporate a heterogeneous effect within the cross-sections by using a nonlinear panel autoregressive distributed lag model, which serves as a panel data adaptation of the Shin et al. (2014) framework and is comparable to the nonstationary heterogeneous panel data model. Findings The findings indicate that final system stability exhibits asymmetric responses to AI, with the latter displaying a more pronounced reaction. The results remain consistent across various AI proxies. Ultimately, the findings emanating from the study carry significant implications for financial system regulators. Originality/value This paper addresses gaps in the AI–financial stability literature by empirically examining the relationship internationally, where existing studies are limited. While some prior research (e.g. Daud et al., 2022; Li, 2021; Khan et al., 2023a) explores this globally, they do not fully account for nonlinearities and heterogeneity effects. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to use panel data to incorporate both aspects, offering a more comprehensive understanding of AI’s impact on financial stability. Doing so advances empirical knowledge beyond the largely theoretical, country-specific focus of earlier work (e.g. Darangwa, 2021; Chen and Du, 2016).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Economic Policy
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfep-10-2024-0306
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disruptor or enabler? AI and financial system stability

Romanus Osabohien, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al‐Faryan, Kinglsey Imandojemu, Segun E. Eniola Otokiti et al.
5 citations
Journal of Financial Economic Policy
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
11.04
article

Disruptor or enabler? AI and financial system stability

Romanus Osabohien, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al‐Faryan, Kinglsey Imandojemu, Segun E. Eniola Otokiti, Ademayowa M. Adebukunola
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Purpose The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) tools signifies a major advancement in technology, poised to significantly influence the financial system. From a conceptual standpoint, AI introduces both advantages and challenges to the financial landscape. Thus, this study aims to examine the dynamics between AI and financial system stability through several distinct approaches. Initially, the authors investigate potential nonlinearities in this relationship to assess the asymmetric reactions of financial system stability to the application of AI, both positive and negative. Design/methodology/approach Subsequently, to address intra-country variations, the authors incorporate a heterogeneous effect within the cross-sections by using a nonlinear panel autoregressive distributed lag model, which serves as a panel data adaptation of the Shin et al. (2014) framework and is comparable to the nonstationary heterogeneous panel data model. Findings The findings indicate that final system stability exhibits asymmetric responses to AI, with the latter displaying a more pronounced reaction. The results remain consistent across various AI proxies. Ultimately, the findings emanating from the study carry significant implications for financial system regulators. Originality/value This paper addresses gaps in the AI–financial stability literature by empirically examining the relationship internationally, where existing studies are limited. While some prior research (e.g. Daud et al., 2022; Li, 2021; Khan et al., 2023a) explores this globally, they do not fully account for nonlinearities and heterogeneity effects. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to use panel data to incorporate both aspects, offering a more comprehensive understanding of AI’s impact on financial stability. Doing so advances empirical knowledge beyond the largely theoretical, country-specific focus of earlier work (e.g. Darangwa, 2021; Chen and Du, 2016).

Journal of Financial Economic PolicyVol. 17(6)
University of Bradford (GB), The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RU), Babcock University (NG), University of Pittsburgh at Bradford (US), Saudi Heart Association (SA), Universiti Tenaga Nasional (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
11.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.