Going Forward by Staying Put: The Political Economy of Stabilizing Trade Agreements and Initiatives

Increasingly, states are entering into trade agreements or negotiating initiatives which sustain Parties’ existing market access commitments and ‘behind-the-border’ regulatory barriers to trade. This article examines the political economy of such stabilizing trade agreements or initiatives (STAIs). First, it provides a functional account of what STAIs are as legal instruments and maps the formal diversity of such arrangements. Second, the article addresses how they may meaningfully support the welfare-enhancement and international security protection objectives typically pursued by international trade agreements. Finally, it shows how, in the absence of trade liberalization as a driving force, STAIs rely on three core governance functions: (1) stabilizing economic actor expectations when liberalization commitments between trade partners are rebalanced, (2) facilitating regulatory and political cooperation between trade partners, and (3) creating a first mover’s advantage for (coalitions of) trade partners in setting new rules of economic governance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of World Trade
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2025023
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Going Forward by Staying Put: The Political Economy of Stabilizing Trade Agreements and Initiatives

Christian Delev
Journal of World Trade
World Trade Organization Law
article

Going Forward by Staying Put: The Political Economy of Stabilizing Trade Agreements and Initiatives

Christian Delev
article en

Abstract

Increasingly, states are entering into trade agreements or negotiating initiatives which sustain Parties’ existing market access commitments and ‘behind-the-border’ regulatory barriers to trade. This article examines the political economy of such stabilizing trade agreements or initiatives (STAIs). First, it provides a functional account of what STAIs are as legal instruments and maps the formal diversity of such arrangements. Second, the article addresses how they may meaningfully support the welfare-enhancement and international security protection objectives typically pursued by international trade agreements. Finally, it shows how, in the absence of trade liberalization as a driving force, STAIs rely on three core governance functions: (1) stabilizing economic actor expectations when liberalization commitments between trade partners are rebalanced, (2) facilitating regulatory and political cooperation between trade partners, and (3) creating a first mover’s advantage for (coalitions of) trade partners in setting new rules of economic governance.

Journal of World TradeVol. 59(Issue 3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.