Reflection and Optimization Path of Shared Court Construction—Taking Zhejiang Province as an Example

共享法庭是浙江省顺应数字司法改革所创造的时代产物。作为一站式诉讼服务、一站式多元解纷和一站式基层治理的最小支点，共享法庭以其“不增编、不建房”的独特优势，逐渐在浙江省生根发芽，将司法服务延伸至基层治理的最末梢。但在共享法庭建设过程中，隐忧逐渐显现，例如规则阙如、下沉困难、群众基础弱等一系列问题，这些问题阻碍了共享法庭的发展。为能够走上良性发展的轨道，“共享法庭”在未来应汲取枫桥经验的理论内涵，不断完善具体规则，在化解下沉困境、紧密联系人民群众等方面稳步进展，实现共享法庭从高数量向高质量发展。The shared court is an institutional innovation created by Zhejiang Province in response to the reform of digital justice. As the smallest support point for one litigation services, one-stop diversified dispute resolution, and one-stop grassroots governance, the shared court has gradually taken root and sprouted in Zhejiang Province with its unique of “not increasing the establishment and not building new houses”, extending judicial services to the most peripheral end of grassroots governance. However, during the construction process of the shared, a series of problems have gradually emerged, such as the lack of specific rules, the difficulty in implementing it at the grassroots level, and the lack of close with the people, which have hindered the development of the shared court. In order to be able to embark on the track of sound development, the “shared court” learn from the theoretical connotation of the Fengqiao Experience in the future, and make steady progress in perfecting specific rules, resolving the dilemma of sinking, closely contacting the people, so as to achieve the transformation of the shared court from high quantity to high quality development.