Article: Global Taxation’s Price: Quantifying Pillar Two Damages in IIA Disputes

This article addresses the emerging conflicts between Pillar Two taxation rules and international investment agreements (IIAs) by focusing on developing methodologies for assessing economic damages in related disputes. The study aims to establish a comprehensive framework for quantifying economic losses arising from potential IIA violations due to Pillar Two implementation. It examines the legal basis for damage claims under IIAs by analysing relevant precedents and provisions. The research evaluates various methodological approaches for calculating damages in international investment disputes and assesses their suitability for Pillar Two-related scenarios. Economic models and quantitative techniques, such as the discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis and the lost profit method, are examined for their effectiveness in estimating Pillar Two’s financial impact on investors. The article incorporates case studies and reviews past damage assessments in tax-related contexts. It discusses policy implications and offers guidelines for key stakeholders including policymakers, investors, and arbitral tribunals as well as focusing on best practices and potential challenges in damage assessment. This research aims to alleviate a critical deficiency in the existing literature by providing a nuanced, multidimensional framework to facilitate a more informed approach to resolving disputes at the intersection of Pillar Two rules and IIAs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Intertax
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2025040
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Article: Global Taxation’s Price: Quantifying Pillar Two Damages in IIA Disputes

Antônio Lopo Martinez
Intertax
Taxation and Legal Issues
article

Article: Global Taxation’s Price: Quantifying Pillar Two Damages in IIA Disputes

Antônio Lopo Martinez
article en

Abstract

This article addresses the emerging conflicts between Pillar Two taxation rules and international investment agreements (IIAs) by focusing on developing methodologies for assessing economic damages in related disputes. The study aims to establish a comprehensive framework for quantifying economic losses arising from potential IIA violations due to Pillar Two implementation. It examines the legal basis for damage claims under IIAs by analysing relevant precedents and provisions. The research evaluates various methodological approaches for calculating damages in international investment disputes and assesses their suitability for Pillar Two-related scenarios. Economic models and quantitative techniques, such as the discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis and the lost profit method, are examined for their effectiveness in estimating Pillar Two’s financial impact on investors. The article incorporates case studies and reviews past damage assessments in tax-related contexts. It discusses policy implications and offers guidelines for key stakeholders including policymakers, investors, and arbitral tribunals as well as focusing on best practices and potential challenges in damage assessment. This research aims to alleviate a critical deficiency in the existing literature by providing a nuanced, multidimensional framework to facilitate a more informed approach to resolving disputes at the intersection of Pillar Two rules and IIAs.

IntertaxVol. 53(Issue 5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Taxation and Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.