From Independence to “Revolution”: the Evolution of Armenia's Diplomatic Service

Since gaining its independence in 1991, Armenia has faced the complex task of building a professional diplomatic service to support its statehood and navigate a challenging geopolitical landscape. This study examines the evolution of Armenia’s diplomatic service, focusing on critical milestones such as the adoption of the Law on Diplomatic Service (2001) and the establishment of the Diplomatic School of Armenia (2009). Using a mixed-methods approach, including primary source research and interviews with former diplomats and scholars, the study examines how institutional frameworks, political leadership, and external pressures have shaped the country’s foreign service. The findings reveal that Armenia’s diplomatic service was initially influenced by Soviet-era bureaucratic structures, supplemented by contributions from the Armenian diaspora and local graduates of specialized academic programs. Over time, successive administrations sought to professionalize the service through institutional reforms. However, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) has frequently struggled with challenges such as centralization and politicization of decision-making. Recent developments under Nikol Pashinyan’s 'revolutionary' government highlight the erosion of institutionalized practices, including the weakening of the Diplomatic School’s role and the prioritization of political loyalty over merit-based appointments. This paper contributes to the understanding of state-building in post-Soviet contexts by analyzing the interplay between institutional development, bureaucratic politics, and sovereignty in Armenia’s diplomacy. The study concludes that while Armenia has made significant progress in institutionalizing its diplomatic service, sustaining these achievements requires addressing current trends that undermine its effectiveness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Analytics
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2024-15-4-137-157
Primary Topic
Turkey's Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Independence to “Revolution”: the Evolution of Armenia's Diplomatic Service

Seta Melkonian, К. М. Jalatyan
Journal of International Analytics
Turkey's Politics and Society
article

From Independence to “Revolution”: the Evolution of Armenia's Diplomatic Service

Seta Melkonian, К. М. Jalatyan
article en

Abstract

Since gaining its independence in 1991, Armenia has faced the complex task of building a professional diplomatic service to support its statehood and navigate a challenging geopolitical landscape. This study examines the evolution of Armenia’s diplomatic service, focusing on critical milestones such as the adoption of the Law on Diplomatic Service (2001) and the establishment of the Diplomatic School of Armenia (2009). Using a mixed-methods approach, including primary source research and interviews with former diplomats and scholars, the study examines how institutional frameworks, political leadership, and external pressures have shaped the country’s foreign service. The findings reveal that Armenia’s diplomatic service was initially influenced by Soviet-era bureaucratic structures, supplemented by contributions from the Armenian diaspora and local graduates of specialized academic programs. Over time, successive administrations sought to professionalize the service through institutional reforms. However, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) has frequently struggled with challenges such as centralization and politicization of decision-making. Recent developments under Nikol Pashinyan’s 'revolutionary' government highlight the erosion of institutionalized practices, including the weakening of the Diplomatic School’s role and the prioritization of political loyalty over merit-based appointments. This paper contributes to the understanding of state-building in post-Soviet contexts by analyzing the interplay between institutional development, bureaucratic politics, and sovereignty in Armenia’s diplomacy. The study concludes that while Armenia has made significant progress in institutionalizing its diplomatic service, sustaining these achievements requires addressing current trends that undermine its effectiveness.

Journal of International AnalyticsVol. 15(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Turkey's Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.