State support for social entrepreneurship in the reunited regions of Russia: status and ways to improve

The purpose of the article is to determine the features of the formation of the institution of social entrepreneurship in the reunited regions (Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, Zaporizhia and Kherson regions) and to substantiate the ways to improve the instruments of its state support. The article emphasizes the potential of individual regional programs that can become an effective tool for adapting these territories to the social standards of the country. In addition, the role of the Centers for Innovation in the Social Sphere (CISS) as the core of the emerging system for building new mechanisms for social entrepreneurship in regions with deformed methods of state regulation is highlighted. This system includes all three levels of public administration: federal, regional and municipal. The first includes federal programs, grants and preferential lending. The second includes regional programs, infrastructure for supporting entrepreneurship. The third includes property support, primarily lease of premises and land on preferential terms. Moreover, the last level is the most problematic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Moscow University Bulletin Series 21 Public administration
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55959/msu2073-2643-22-2025-1-42-61
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State support for social entrepreneurship in the reunited regions of Russia: status and ways to improve

A.V. Gomaskova, Gennady L. Kupryashin
Moscow University Bulletin Series 21 Public administration
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
article

State support for social entrepreneurship in the reunited regions of Russia: status and ways to improve

A.V. Gomaskova, Gennady L. Kupryashin
article en

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to determine the features of the formation of the institution of social entrepreneurship in the reunited regions (Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, Zaporizhia and Kherson regions) and to substantiate the ways to improve the instruments of its state support. The article emphasizes the potential of individual regional programs that can become an effective tool for adapting these territories to the social standards of the country. In addition, the role of the Centers for Innovation in the Social Sphere (CISS) as the core of the emerging system for building new mechanisms for social entrepreneurship in regions with deformed methods of state regulation is highlighted. This system includes all three levels of public administration: federal, regional and municipal. The first includes federal programs, grants and preferential lending. The second includes regional programs, infrastructure for supporting entrepreneurship. The third includes property support, primarily lease of premises and land on preferential terms. Moreover, the last level is the most problematic.

Moscow University Bulletin Series 21 Public administration(№1, 2025)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

State support for social entrepreneurship in the reunited regions of Russia: status and ways to improve — A.V. Gomaskova, Gennady L. Kupryashin · Moscow University Bulletin Series 21 Public administration (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS