Multinationals and intra-regional innovation concentration

This article examines the extent to which the presence of multinational enterprises (MNEs) influences the concentration of innovation among patenting firms within US states from 1976 to 2010. Merging patent and regional socioeconomic data, this study explores the effects within 50 US states over more than three decades using Ordinary-Least-Square and Instrumental Variable estimations. It shows that MNEs significantly contribute to the concentration of patenting activity, an effect predominantly driven by domestic-owned MNEs. The impact differs across space: states with a higher share of MNEs experience a sharper increase in patenting concentration. Crucially, it is the non-MNE firms that feel the squeeze the most, with those in the middle of the patenting hierarchy producing fewer patents when domestic MNEs ramp up their activity. This suggests that economic globalisation, while enhancing innovation opportunities for some, reinforces competitive pressures and barriers for others. These findings offer a new perspective on the forces shaping regional innovation dynamics, highlighting the role of MNEs in both amplifying innovation gains and exacerbating disparities in knowledge production. • Patenting activity in the US has become increasingly concentrated over the past three decades. • The presence of multinational enterprises (MNEs) is strongly associated with higher patenting concentration. • Domestic-owned MNEs, rather than foreign-owned firms, drive this effect. • The impact is uneven across space: states with a higher share of MNEs see a greater rise in patenting concentration. • Less innovative firms face a negative effect, with those in the middle of the patenting distribution producing fewer patents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Policy
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105235
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multinationals and intra-regional innovation concentration

Martina Pardy
3 citations
Research Policy
Global trade and economics
9.26
article

Multinationals and intra-regional innovation concentration

Martina Pardy
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which the presence of multinational enterprises (MNEs) influences the concentration of innovation among patenting firms within US states from 1976 to 2010. Merging patent and regional socioeconomic data, this study explores the effects within 50 US states over more than three decades using Ordinary-Least-Square and Instrumental Variable estimations. It shows that MNEs significantly contribute to the concentration of patenting activity, an effect predominantly driven by domestic-owned MNEs. The impact differs across space: states with a higher share of MNEs experience a sharper increase in patenting concentration. Crucially, it is the non-MNE firms that feel the squeeze the most, with those in the middle of the patenting hierarchy producing fewer patents when domestic MNEs ramp up their activity. This suggests that economic globalisation, while enhancing innovation opportunities for some, reinforces competitive pressures and barriers for others. These findings offer a new perspective on the forces shaping regional innovation dynamics, highlighting the role of MNEs in both amplifying innovation gains and exacerbating disparities in knowledge production. • Patenting activity in the US has become increasingly concentrated over the past three decades. • The presence of multinational enterprises (MNEs) is strongly associated with higher patenting concentration. • Domestic-owned MNEs, rather than foreign-owned firms, drive this effect. • The impact is uneven across space: states with a higher share of MNEs see a greater rise in patenting concentration. • Less innovative firms face a negative effect, with those in the middle of the patenting distribution producing fewer patents.

Research PolicyVol. 54(6)
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
European Commission, Horizon 2020
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global trade and economics
9.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multinationals and intra-regional innovation concentration — Martina Pardy · Research Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS