Enhancing Dispute Resolution in Maritime Law: The Role of the New York Convention in Arbitration

With 170 members, the most often adopted basic legal tool in international arbitration is the New York Convention of 1958. The New York Convention has more validity and efficiency of arbitration as a means of resolving international commercial conflicts as long as the grounds given under Article V of the Convention are not invoked; hence, the contracting states are under obligation to take actions under the Convention to ensure and implement the recognition of arbitral rulings in line with the Convention. In maritime law, where most of the conflicts have foreign elements, this is clearly illustrated. Making sure the arbitration's verdicts lead to enforcement is crucial, so most of the concepts used there are more likely and straightforward than those used in ordinary litigation. This paper looks at the purpose of the New York Convention in maritime arbitration; it assesses its impact on the arbitration rules worldwide as well as on the evolution of arbitration in the marine industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.vi-i.25326
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Dispute Resolution in Maritime Law: The Role of the New York Convention in Arbitration

Tang Ya, Maaz Ahmad, Shakeb Khan
Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
International Maritime Law Issues
article

Enhancing Dispute Resolution in Maritime Law: The Role of the New York Convention in Arbitration

Tang Ya, Maaz Ahmad, Shakeb Khan
article en

Abstract

With 170 members, the most often adopted basic legal tool in international arbitration is the New York Convention of 1958. The New York Convention has more validity and efficiency of arbitration as a means of resolving international commercial conflicts as long as the grounds given under Article V of the Convention are not invoked; hence, the contracting states are under obligation to take actions under the Convention to ensure and implement the recognition of arbitral rulings in line with the Convention. In maritime law, where most of the conflicts have foreign elements, this is clearly illustrated. Making sure the arbitration's verdicts lead to enforcement is crucial, so most of the concepts used there are more likely and straightforward than those used in ordinary litigation. This paper looks at the purpose of the New York Convention in maritime arbitration; it assesses its impact on the arbitration rules worldwide as well as on the evolution of arbitration in the marine industry.

Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences and HumanitiesVol. 6(1)
China University of Political Science and Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
International Maritime Law Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.