An Outline of Enactive Relationalism in the Philosophy and Ethics of Robotics

Abstract This paper proposes an enhanced version of the relational approach in the philosophy and ethics of robotics by integrating it with enactivism. The paper begins by providing a concise overview of the relational approach within the field, outlining its key contributions and limitations. It then identifies significant issues in the current version of relationalism, such as its reliance on partial phenomenology, the problem of morality-before-morality, bad inclusion, and the treatment of the relation as a black box. To address these concerns, the paper introduces phenomenologically inspired enactivism and demonstrates how incorporating enactivist principles can resolve these challenges. By applying enactivism, the paper argues for a more robust understanding of human-robot interaction, where relational dynamics are understood as lived, embodied processes that are essential for constructing the otherness of robots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00882-9
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Outline of Enactive Relationalism in the Philosophy and Ethics of Robotics

Abootaleb Safdari
5 citations
Philosophy & Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
article

An Outline of Enactive Relationalism in the Philosophy and Ethics of Robotics

Abootaleb Safdari
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper proposes an enhanced version of the relational approach in the philosophy and ethics of robotics by integrating it with enactivism. The paper begins by providing a concise overview of the relational approach within the field, outlining its key contributions and limitations. It then identifies significant issues in the current version of relationalism, such as its reliance on partial phenomenology, the problem of morality-before-morality, bad inclusion, and the treatment of the relation as a black box. To address these concerns, the paper introduces phenomenologically inspired enactivism and demonstrates how incorporating enactivist principles can resolve these challenges. By applying enactivism, the paper argues for a more robust understanding of human-robot interaction, where relational dynamics are understood as lived, embodied processes that are essential for constructing the otherness of robots.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 38(2)
University of Bremen (DE)
Universität Bremen
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.