Understanding the Change Trajectories of Team Transition and Action Processes Over Time: A Regulatory Focus Perspective

ABSTRACT Team transition processes (i.e., teams' evaluation and planning activities for goal accomplishment) and team action processes (i.e., teams' activities directly contributing to goal accomplishment) have been long conceptualized as dynamic; yet there has been little understanding of what drives team process dynamics and what results from it. Drawing on team development and team regulatory focus research, we examine the change trajectories of transition and action processes in temporally bounded teams and antecedents and consequences of such trajectories. We posit that deadlines for output delivery shift team members' attention and effort from conceptualizing project ideas and forming task structures to implementing project ideas and executing team tasks, thus rendering team transition processes to decrease and team action processes to increase over time. The extent to which transition processes decrease and action processes increase over time is determined by team regulatory focus, as team promotion focus sustains team effort for improvement and accomplishment over time and team prevention focus constrains it. Given that transition and action processes both contribute to team performance, teams that experience a less decrease in transition processes or a greater increase in action processes over time will achieve higher team performance in the end. We conducted a longitudinal study with 125 four‐person student teams engaged in a business simulation over 7 weeks and measured team processes weekly. Overall, results from latent growth modeling (LGM) support our hypotheses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2878
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Change Trajectories of Team Transition and Action Processes Over Time: A Regulatory Focus Perspective

Ci‐Rong Li, Jia Li
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Understanding the Change Trajectories of Team Transition and Action Processes Over Time: A Regulatory Focus Perspective

Ci‐Rong Li, Jia Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Team transition processes (i.e., teams' evaluation and planning activities for goal accomplishment) and team action processes (i.e., teams' activities directly contributing to goal accomplishment) have been long conceptualized as dynamic; yet there has been little understanding of what drives team process dynamics and what results from it. Drawing on team development and team regulatory focus research, we examine the change trajectories of transition and action processes in temporally bounded teams and antecedents and consequences of such trajectories. We posit that deadlines for output delivery shift team members' attention and effort from conceptualizing project ideas and forming task structures to implementing project ideas and executing team tasks, thus rendering team transition processes to decrease and team action processes to increase over time. The extent to which transition processes decrease and action processes increase over time is determined by team regulatory focus, as team promotion focus sustains team effort for improvement and accomplishment over time and team prevention focus constrains it. Given that transition and action processes both contribute to team performance, teams that experience a less decrease in transition processes or a greater increase in action processes over time will achieve higher team performance in the end. We conducted a longitudinal study with 125 four‐person student teams engaged in a business simulation over 7 weeks and measured team processes weekly. Overall, results from latent growth modeling (LGM) support our hypotheses.

Journal of Organizational BehaviorVol. 46(6)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Jilin University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.