Examining the use of ChatGPT in Argumentative Writing: A Mixed Methods Study

The study explored the adoption of ChatGPT in argumentative writing among students using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model as a framework. A mixed methods study was employed, and data were collected from surveys, interviews and document analysis (essays). The study revealed that participants’ acceptance of ChatGPT is linked to performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitation conditions, social influence, self-efficacy, and habit. However, establishing habitual use is still in its initial phases, and social influences are not the primary drivers behind students’ adoption of the tool. Participants reported improved organization, expanded vocabulary, and valuable writing prompts, enhancing their learning experience in argumentative writing. Participants intended to continue using ChatGPT for essay writing, acknowledging its significant contribution to argumentative writing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Academics
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x251333859
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the use of ChatGPT in Argumentative Writing: A Mixed Methods Study

Nagaletchimee Annamalai, Brandford Bervell, Arulselvi Uthayakumaran, Ramesh Kumar
4 citations
Journal of Advanced Academics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
2.62
article

Examining the use of ChatGPT in Argumentative Writing: A Mixed Methods Study

Nagaletchimee Annamalai, Brandford Bervell, Arulselvi Uthayakumaran, Ramesh Kumar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The study explored the adoption of ChatGPT in argumentative writing among students using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model as a framework. A mixed methods study was employed, and data were collected from surveys, interviews and document analysis (essays). The study revealed that participants’ acceptance of ChatGPT is linked to performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitation conditions, social influence, self-efficacy, and habit. However, establishing habitual use is still in its initial phases, and social influences are not the primary drivers behind students’ adoption of the tool. Participants reported improved organization, expanded vocabulary, and valuable writing prompts, enhancing their learning experience in argumentative writing. Participants intended to continue using ChatGPT for essay writing, acknowledging its significant contribution to argumentative writing.

Journal of Advanced AcademicsVol. 36(3)
Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (MY), University of Cape Coast (GH), Ajman University (AE), Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
2.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.