A Comparative Analysis of Work Regulatory Focus on Cross-Generational Employees at PT. "X"

The variability of individual characteristics in the workplace relates to how they achieve their goals at work. If the direction of work regulations is not in accordance with the desired goals, then the balance between personal life and work expected by employees will not be achieved. This study is a comparative quantitative research that aims to see the difference between three subjects with the same variable not to investigate causal relationships. This study uses Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to identify whether there is a difference in the focus of labor regulations among Generation X, Y, and Z workers at PT. "X". The results show that Generation X has the lowest average in both dimensions as a comparison. There is a significant difference between Generation Y and Generation Z, with a p-value of .000 (p<0.001). This study revealed significant differences in the characteristics and work preferences between Generation X, Y, and Z in the Prevention Focus and Promotion Focus variables. Further analysis shows that Generation Y and Z, who value flexibility and are more open to technology, are in contrast to Generation X, who prioritize stability and structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
In Trend International Journal of Trends in Global Psychological Science and Education
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62260/intrend.v2i2.402
Primary Topic
Employee Performance and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Work Regulatory Focus on Cross-Generational Employees at PT. "X"

Anindra Guspa, Deri Setyawan
In Trend International Journal of Trends in Global Psychological Science and Education
Employee Performance and Management
article

A Comparative Analysis of Work Regulatory Focus on Cross-Generational Employees at PT. "X"

Anindra Guspa, Deri Setyawan
article en

Abstract

The variability of individual characteristics in the workplace relates to how they achieve their goals at work. If the direction of work regulations is not in accordance with the desired goals, then the balance between personal life and work expected by employees will not be achieved. This study is a comparative quantitative research that aims to see the difference between three subjects with the same variable not to investigate causal relationships. This study uses Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to identify whether there is a difference in the focus of labor regulations among Generation X, Y, and Z workers at PT. "X". The results show that Generation X has the lowest average in both dimensions as a comparison. There is a significant difference between Generation Y and Generation Z, with a p-value of .000 (p<0.001). This study revealed significant differences in the characteristics and work preferences between Generation X, Y, and Z in the Prevention Focus and Promotion Focus variables. Further analysis shows that Generation Y and Z, who value flexibility and are more open to technology, are in contrast to Generation X, who prioritize stability and structure.

In Trend International Journal of Trends in Global Psychological Science and EducationVol. 2(2)
State University of Padang (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Employee Performance and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of Work Regulatory Focus on Cross-Generational Employees at PT. "X" — Anindra Guspa, Deri Setyawan · In Trend International Journal of Trends in Global Psychological Science and Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS