Nyt lys på Jesu Barndoms Bog

The influential Middle High German “Marienleben” (c. 1300) by the Carthusian Philipp von Seitz is known to be an important source for the Old Danish popular book on the life of Mary and the infant Christ, known as “Jesu Barndoms Bog”, first published in 1508 by the Dutch printer Govert van Ghemen in Copenhagen. The Old Danish version is probably based not on the Middle High German text, but on a Middle Low German (or even Middle Dutch) manuscript. In this article the manuscript Lübeck, Stadtbibliotek, Ms. theol. germ. 23 4° is presented as a better means of comparison than the Middle High German text. Even though Ghemen’s print is not based on a single source, the Lübeck manuscript and the Old Danish version share extra material not found in any other German version. This article, partly based on a new book by Christina Ostermann on the Middle Low German reception of “Marienleben”, argues that Ostermann’s book and the Lübeck manuscript should be a point of departure for future research into “Jesu Barndoms Bog”.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Arkiv för nordisk filologi
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63420/anf.v135i.27838
Primary Topic
Theological Perspectives and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nyt lys på Jesu Barndoms Bog

Simon Skogvaard Boeck
Arkiv för nordisk filologi
Theological Perspectives and Practices
article

Nyt lys på Jesu Barndoms Bog

Simon Skogvaard Boeck
article en

Abstract

The influential Middle High German “Marienleben” (c. 1300) by the Carthusian Philipp von Seitz is known to be an important source for the Old Danish popular book on the life of Mary and the infant Christ, known as “Jesu Barndoms Bog”, first published in 1508 by the Dutch printer Govert van Ghemen in Copenhagen. The Old Danish version is probably based not on the Middle High German text, but on a Middle Low German (or even Middle Dutch) manuscript. In this article the manuscript Lübeck, Stadtbibliotek, Ms. theol. germ. 23 4° is presented as a better means of comparison than the Middle High German text. Even though Ghemen’s print is not based on a single source, the Lübeck manuscript and the Old Danish version share extra material not found in any other German version. This article, partly based on a new book by Christina Ostermann on the Middle Low German reception of “Marienleben”, argues that Ostermann’s book and the Lübeck manuscript should be a point of departure for future research into “Jesu Barndoms Bog”.

Arkiv för nordisk filologiVol. 135
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Theological Perspectives and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.