Auditing, the State and Democracy in a “New” Machine Age of Digitalization: The <scp>UK</scp> Supreme Audit Institution

ABSTRACT Many promises have been made about digitalization in the public sector, from its potential to revolutionize government to its emancipating properties as a new conduit for democracy. In this paper, the case of a leading Supreme Audit Institution (SAI), the UK National Audit Office, is examined. SAIs are essential to the ways in which government is managed and held to account. The paper examines the paradox that despite the promises made about digitalization, the digitalization of audit has progressed but has not been as revolutionary as its evangelists would expect. The paper breaks down the reasons for this by examining the regulatory space in which SAIs sit: Looking at their mandate, capacity, and reporting, and it shows that in all these, there are reasons why it is harder to digitalize than it looks from the outside. This has lessons for the broader public sector and beyond regarding change and technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13062
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auditing, the State and Democracy in a “New” Machine Age of Digitalization: The UK Supreme Audit Institution

Thomas Ahrens, Henry Midgley, Laurence Ferry
4 citations
Public Administration
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
15.64
article

Auditing, the State and Democracy in a “New” Machine Age of Digitalization: The UK Supreme Audit Institution

Thomas Ahrens, Henry Midgley, Laurence Ferry
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many promises have been made about digitalization in the public sector, from its potential to revolutionize government to its emancipating properties as a new conduit for democracy. In this paper, the case of a leading Supreme Audit Institution (SAI), the UK National Audit Office, is examined. SAIs are essential to the ways in which government is managed and held to account. The paper examines the paradox that despite the promises made about digitalization, the digitalization of audit has progressed but has not been as revolutionary as its evangelists would expect. The paper breaks down the reasons for this by examining the regulatory space in which SAIs sit: Looking at their mandate, capacity, and reporting, and it shows that in all these, there are reasons why it is harder to digitalize than it looks from the outside. This has lessons for the broader public sector and beyond regarding change and technology.

Public AdministrationVol. 103(3)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Durham University (GB), United Arab Emirates University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
15.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.