Writing the history of a language and historical linguistics.

In this article, we address the initial volumes of the two series Dansk sproghistorie (DSH) and Norsk språkhistorie (NSH), DSH1 and NSH1, respectively. We briefly present the contents of each volume as well as the overall outline of the entire series. DSH1 and NSH1 are quite different, which makes detailed comparison difficult. However, precisely by being different, they together raise important questions about the tradition of historical linguistics in general and Scandinavian historical linguistics in particular. The bulk of the article is devoted to some of these questions, including how to define the object of study, how to describe and explain grammatical change and what theoretical status to assign to reconstructed forms. We believe that recurrent discussion of fundamental issues of this sort is vital to our field, not least in relation to the new bearers of tradition that DSH and NSH will undoubtedly be.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Arkiv för nordisk filologi
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63420/anf.v135i.27841
Primary Topic
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Writing the history of a language and historical linguistics.

Ida Larsson, Erik Magnusson Petzell
Arkiv för nordisk filologi
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
article

Writing the history of a language and historical linguistics.

Ida Larsson, Erik Magnusson Petzell
article en

Abstract

In this article, we address the initial volumes of the two series Dansk sproghistorie (DSH) and Norsk språkhistorie (NSH), DSH1 and NSH1, respectively. We briefly present the contents of each volume as well as the overall outline of the entire series. DSH1 and NSH1 are quite different, which makes detailed comparison difficult. However, precisely by being different, they together raise important questions about the tradition of historical linguistics in general and Scandinavian historical linguistics in particular. The bulk of the article is devoted to some of these questions, including how to define the object of study, how to describe and explain grammatical change and what theoretical status to assign to reconstructed forms. We believe that recurrent discussion of fundamental issues of this sort is vital to our field, not least in relation to the new bearers of tradition that DSH and NSH will undoubtedly be.

Arkiv för nordisk filologiVol. 135
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.