Routine Screening for Neurocognitive Impairment in Patients with Craniosynostosis: Towards a Standardized Approach

ObjectiveBeyond aesthetic implications, craniosynostosis can profoundly impact neurocognitive development. There is a notable gap in standardized methodologies for identifying which of these patients are at-risk for developing adverse neuropsychosocial outcomes through screening techniques. This research aims to identify and recommend a standardized, routine approach inclusive of free or low-cost screening instruments for patients with craniosynostosis that are easily administered in clinic with or without a trained examiner.DesignA systematic review was conducted. Data related to various developmental assessments were extracted and subsequently reviewed by two trained neuropsychologists for analysis, categorization, and recommendation.Main Outcomes MeasuresNeurocognitive screening assessments for patients with craniosynostosis.ResultsIn total, 114 different tests regarding neurocognitive examination of patients with craniosynostosis were cited. We identified six areas of neuropsychosocial development that are relevant for routine screening: Development, Social-Emotional/Behavioral, Adaptive Functioning, Academic Achievement, Autism, and ADHD/Attention. Within each category, screening recommendations are made, including instruments that are free or low-cost and can be easily administered in clinic with or without a trained examiner.ConclusionsLiterature supports the impact of craniosynostosis on neuropsychosocial development, so we urge teams to screen patients from an early age using these suggestions as they are free or relatively low-cost, can be administered to a wide range of patient ages, and can be administered in clinic with or without a trained examiner. This study serves as a starting point towards a more standardized approach to effectively evaluate and address the neurocognitive implications of craniosynostosis, ultimately enhancing patient care and treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251335475
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Routine Screening for Neurocognitive Impairment in Patients with Craniosynostosis: Towards a Standardized Approach

Robin J. Evans, Payton Kathryn Grande, Billy Holcombe, Devra B. Becker et al.
1 citations
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
1.82
article

Routine Screening for Neurocognitive Impairment in Patients with Craniosynostosis: Towards a Standardized Approach

Robin J. Evans, Payton Kathryn Grande, Billy Holcombe, Devra B. Becker, Christen M. Holder
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveBeyond aesthetic implications, craniosynostosis can profoundly impact neurocognitive development. There is a notable gap in standardized methodologies for identifying which of these patients are at-risk for developing adverse neuropsychosocial outcomes through screening techniques. This research aims to identify and recommend a standardized, routine approach inclusive of free or low-cost screening instruments for patients with craniosynostosis that are easily administered in clinic with or without a trained examiner.DesignA systematic review was conducted. Data related to various developmental assessments were extracted and subsequently reviewed by two trained neuropsychologists for analysis, categorization, and recommendation.Main Outcomes MeasuresNeurocognitive screening assessments for patients with craniosynostosis.ResultsIn total, 114 different tests regarding neurocognitive examination of patients with craniosynostosis were cited. We identified six areas of neuropsychosocial development that are relevant for routine screening: Development, Social-Emotional/Behavioral, Adaptive Functioning, Academic Achievement, Autism, and ADHD/Attention. Within each category, screening recommendations are made, including instruments that are free or low-cost and can be easily administered in clinic with or without a trained examiner.ConclusionsLiterature supports the impact of craniosynostosis on neuropsychosocial development, so we urge teams to screen patients from an early age using these suggestions as they are free or relatively low-cost, can be administered to a wide range of patient ages, and can be administered in clinic with or without a trained examiner. This study serves as a starting point towards a more standardized approach to effectively evaluate and address the neurocognitive implications of craniosynostosis, ultimately enhancing patient care and treatment outcomes.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Emory University (US), University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), Le Bonheur Children's Hospital (US), Morehouse School of Medicine (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.