Learning to comprehend and explain spatial metaphors for time in Chinese

Time is frequently structured in terms of motion as moving-time (e.g., "summer is coming"), moving-ego (e.g., "we approach winter"), or sequence-as-position (e.g., "winter follows autumn") across the world's languages, including Chinese - a language that shows greater variability in its expression of such metaphors. Using a metaphor explanation and a metaphor comprehension task, we tested 60 children learning Chinese, equally divided into ages 3-4, 5-6, 7-8. Children's performance improved with age, marking ages 7-8 as the period with significant gains in both comprehension and explanation of metaphors - a later mastery compared to children learning English shown in earlier work. Metaphor type also affected children's performance, but only for the explanation and <i>not</i> the comprehension of metaphors. Overall, our findings highlight that the structure of spatial metaphors for time in Chinese influences the <i>timing</i> but <i>not the trajectory</i> of children's development in learning spatial metaphors for time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Child Language
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000925000145
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning to comprehend and explain spatial metaphors for time in Chinese

Lauren J. Stites, Jing Paul, Şeyda Özçalışkan
Journal of Child Language
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

Learning to comprehend and explain spatial metaphors for time in Chinese

Lauren J. Stites, Jing Paul, Şeyda Özçalışkan
article en

Abstract

Time is frequently structured in terms of motion as moving-time (e.g., "summer is coming"), moving-ego (e.g., "we approach winter"), or sequence-as-position (e.g., "winter follows autumn") across the world's languages, including Chinese - a language that shows greater variability in its expression of such metaphors. Using a metaphor explanation and a metaphor comprehension task, we tested 60 children learning Chinese, equally divided into ages 3-4, 5-6, 7-8. Children's performance improved with age, marking ages 7-8 as the period with significant gains in both comprehension and explanation of metaphors - a later mastery compared to children learning English shown in earlier work. Metaphor type also affected children's performance, but only for the explanation and <i>not</i> the comprehension of metaphors. Overall, our findings highlight that the structure of spatial metaphors for time in Chinese influences the <i>timing</i> but <i>not the trajectory</i> of children's development in learning spatial metaphors for time.

Journal of Child Language
Georgia State University (US), Agnes Scott College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Learning to comprehend and explain spatial metaphors for time in Chinese — Lauren J. Stites, Jing Paul, et al. · Journal of Child Language (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS