Defamation Claims Arising from Research Misconduct Cases: Best Practices for Institutions

Researchers involved in research misconduct proceedings are increasingly threatening or bringing legal defamation claims against the institutions, complainants, and publications involved in the proceedings. Although defamation claims do not often succeed, they can nevertheless be costly and lengthy. This article analyzes certain defamation cases in the research misconduct space and provides advice for institutions and other involved parties seeking to minimize potential defamation liability associated with research misconduct proceedings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.37
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defamation Claims Arising from Research Misconduct Cases: Best Practices for Institutions

Minal M. Caron, Barbara E. Bierer, Lucia Walsh, Mark Barnes et al.
3 citations
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Academic integrity and plagiarism
7.10
article

Defamation Claims Arising from Research Misconduct Cases: Best Practices for Institutions

Minal M. Caron, Barbara E. Bierer, Lucia Walsh, Mark Barnes, Nathaniel Jaffe
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Researchers involved in research misconduct proceedings are increasingly threatening or bringing legal defamation claims against the institutions, complainants, and publications involved in the proceedings. Although defamation claims do not often succeed, they can nevertheless be costly and lengthy. This article analyzes certain defamation cases in the research misconduct space and provides advice for institutions and other involved parties seeking to minimize potential defamation liability associated with research misconduct proceedings.

The Journal of Law Medicine & EthicsVol. 53(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Office of the General Counsel (US), Jonathan A Law & Associates (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.