Defamation Claims Arising from Research Misconduct Cases: Best Practices for Institutions
Researchers involved in research misconduct proceedings are increasingly threatening or bringing legal defamation claims against the institutions, complainants, and publications involved in the proceedings. Although defamation claims do not often succeed, they can nevertheless be costly and lengthy. This article analyzes certain defamation cases in the research misconduct space and provides advice for institutions and other involved parties seeking to minimize potential defamation liability associated with research misconduct proceedings.
Authors
- Minal M. Caron (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6290-3748)
- Barbara E. Bierer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6448-8170)
- Lucia Walsh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1176-5944)
- Mark Barnes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-4668)
- Nathaniel Jaffe
Institutions
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Office of the General Counsel (US)
- Jonathan A Law & Associates (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.37
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 7.10