Comparison of Different Object Detection and Classification Models

Object detection has become an important task in the field of computer vision, where the goal is to recognize and classify objects in images or videos. This paper presents a comparative analysis of different object detection models, focusing on convolutional neural networks (CNN) and transformer-based architectures. CNN-based models (e.g., the YOLO family) have made significant progress in real-time object detection by efficiently extracting local features via convolutional operations. In contrast, transformer-based models, such as the Visual Transformer (ViT), use self-attention mechanisms to capture global dependencies, improving performance on large-scale datasets. This research explores the evolution of these models and examines their foundations, strengths, and weaknesses. Through experimental evaluations, we show that CNNs continue to dominate when data and computational power are limited, while Transformers exhibit superior scalability and accuracy in complex environments. Our results highlight the complementary nature of these approaches and emphasize the need for hybrid models to achieve optimal performance in different object detection tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied and Computational Engineering
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/2025.22252
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Different Object Detection and Classification Models

謙二 中山, Yanbin Hou, Jiahui Zhou, Zitong Sun et al.
Applied and Computational Engineering
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
article

Comparison of Different Object Detection and Classification Models

謙二 中山, Yanbin Hou, Jiahui Zhou, Zitong Sun, Kaiming Gu, Jie Ding, Qun Yang
article en

Abstract

Object detection has become an important task in the field of computer vision, where the goal is to recognize and classify objects in images or videos. This paper presents a comparative analysis of different object detection models, focusing on convolutional neural networks (CNN) and transformer-based architectures. CNN-based models (e.g., the YOLO family) have made significant progress in real-time object detection by efficiently extracting local features via convolutional operations. In contrast, transformer-based models, such as the Visual Transformer (ViT), use self-attention mechanisms to capture global dependencies, improving performance on large-scale datasets. This research explores the evolution of these models and examines their foundations, strengths, and weaknesses. Through experimental evaluations, we show that CNNs continue to dominate when data and computational power are limited, while Transformers exhibit superior scalability and accuracy in complex environments. Our results highlight the complementary nature of these approaches and emphasize the need for hybrid models to achieve optimal performance in different object detection tasks.

Applied and Computational EngineeringVol. 134(1)
Shandong University (CN), Xi'an University of Technology (CN), Yangzhou Vocational University (CN), University College London (GB), University of California, Davis (US), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Different Object Detection and Classification Models — 謙二 中山, Yanbin Hou, et al. · Applied and Computational Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS