Modified Cued Recall Test: Longitudinal Analysis of Test Versions and Item Recall in Adults With Down Syndrome

Characterising test version differences and participant free versus cued recall performance on the mCRT is important for understanding performance under testing conditions and to maximise the sensitivity of clinical interventions to capture meaningful effects. Our findings suggest that clinical AD trials for DS should be cautious about using both versions of the mCRT. Examining the profile of free relative to cued recall may enhance sensitivity for detecting treatment benefits for adults with DS across the range of premorbid ID levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Published
2025-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13237
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modified Cued Recall Test: Longitudinal Analysis of Test Versions and Item Recall in Adults With Down Syndrome

Margaret B. Pulsifer, Benjamin L. Handen, Sharon J. Krinsky‐McHale, Bradley Christian et al.
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Modified Cued Recall Test: Longitudinal Analysis of Test Versions and Item Recall in Adults With Down Syndrome

Margaret B. Pulsifer, Benjamin L. Handen, Sharon J. Krinsky‐McHale, Bradley Christian, Christy Hom, Emily K. Schworer, Sigan L. Hartley, Elizabeth Head, I. C. H. Clare, Jordan P. Harp, Mark E. Mapstone
article en

Abstract

Characterising test version differences and participant free versus cued recall performance on the mCRT is important for understanding performance under testing conditions and to maximise the sensitivity of clinical interventions to capture meaningful effects. Our findings suggest that clinical AD trials for DS should be cautious about using both versions of the mCRT. Examining the profile of free relative to cued recall may enhance sensitivity for detecting treatment benefits for adults with DS across the range of premorbid ID levels.

Journal of Intellectual Disability ResearchVol. 69(7)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Harvard University (US), University of Kentucky (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of California, Irvine (US), University of Cambridge (GB), New York State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute on Aging, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.