Pengujian Formal terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Komentar terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 145/PUU-XXI/2023

This article discusses issue concerning formal review of Constitutional Court decision. This article comments the Constitutional Court Decision Number 145/PUU-XXI/2023. The Application requests the Constitutional Court to conduct formal review to Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. This issue is very interesting. The Constitutional Court does not have authority over this case because such authority is not explicitly granted by the positive law which is the basis of the Constitutional Court’s jurisdiction. The Constitutional Court rejected the Applicants’ application on the grounds that Constitutional Court Decision was not legislation. This verdict is correct, but not interesting. On that basis, this article argues that this issue is about whether the Constitutional Court will use its judicial discretion or not to decide the case. This article proposes the thesis that although it can exercise judicial discretion, the Constitutional Court should not exercise that discretion.This article discusses issue concerning formal review of Constitutional Court decision. This article comments the Constitutional Court Decision Number 145/PUU-XXI/2023. The Application requests the Constitutional Court to conduct formal review to Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. This issue is very interesting. The Constitutional Court does not have authority over this case because such authority is not explicitly granted by the positive law which is the basis of the Constitutional Court’s jurisdiction. The Constitutional Court rejected the Applicants’ application on the grounds that Constitutional Court Decision was not legislation. This verdict is correct, but not interesting. On that basis, this article argues that this issue is about whether the Constitutional Court will use its judicial discretion or not to decide the case. This article proposes the thesis that although it can exercise judicial discretion, the Constitutional Court should not exercise that discretion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Konstitusi
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2218
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pengujian Formal terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Komentar terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 145/PUU-XXI/2023

Suwarno Abadi
Jurnal Konstitusi
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Pengujian Formal terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Komentar terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 145/PUU-XXI/2023

Suwarno Abadi
article en

Abstract

This article discusses issue concerning formal review of Constitutional Court decision. This article comments the Constitutional Court Decision Number 145/PUU-XXI/2023. The Application requests the Constitutional Court to conduct formal review to Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. This issue is very interesting. The Constitutional Court does not have authority over this case because such authority is not explicitly granted by the positive law which is the basis of the Constitutional Court’s jurisdiction. The Constitutional Court rejected the Applicants’ application on the grounds that Constitutional Court Decision was not legislation. This verdict is correct, but not interesting. On that basis, this article argues that this issue is about whether the Constitutional Court will use its judicial discretion or not to decide the case. This article proposes the thesis that although it can exercise judicial discretion, the Constitutional Court should not exercise that discretion.This article discusses issue concerning formal review of Constitutional Court decision. This article comments the Constitutional Court Decision Number 145/PUU-XXI/2023. The Application requests the Constitutional Court to conduct formal review to Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. This issue is very interesting. The Constitutional Court does not have authority over this case because such authority is not explicitly granted by the positive law which is the basis of the Constitutional Court’s jurisdiction. The Constitutional Court rejected the Applicants’ application on the grounds that Constitutional Court Decision was not legislation. This verdict is correct, but not interesting. On that basis, this article argues that this issue is about whether the Constitutional Court will use its judicial discretion or not to decide the case. This article proposes the thesis that although it can exercise judicial discretion, the Constitutional Court should not exercise that discretion.

Jurnal KonstitusiVol. 22(1)
Universitas Wijaya Putra (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pengujian Formal terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Komentar terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 145/PUU-XXI/2023 — Suwarno Abadi · Jurnal Konstitusi (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS