Inisiasi Penerapan Purcell Principle oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terkait Pemilihan Umum

The Constitutional Court (MK) Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 has sparked discourse regarding the timing of its legal effects, whether for the 2024 or 2029 General Election (Pemilu). According to the Purcell Principle, courts should not rule on cases once the election process has begun. This study aims to answer two questions: (a) How compatible is the Purcell Principle with MK’s authority in judicial review? (b) How has MK initiated the application of the Purcell Principle in judicial review of election-related laws during the election stages? This normative juridical study uses relevant secondary data. The findings show that the Purcell Principle is compatible with MK’s judicial review authority since both apply prospective legal effects. MK previously applied the Purcell Principle in Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013. Over time, MK no longer used it, but in Decision Number 116/PUU-XXI/2023, it “applied” the principle by setting conditional constitutionality for the 2029 election.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Konstitusi
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2216
Primary Topic
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inisiasi Penerapan Purcell Principle oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terkait Pemilihan Umum

Dian Agung Wicaksono, Garuda Era Ruhpinesthi
Jurnal Konstitusi
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
article

Inisiasi Penerapan Purcell Principle oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terkait Pemilihan Umum

Dian Agung Wicaksono, Garuda Era Ruhpinesthi
article en

Abstract

The Constitutional Court (MK) Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 has sparked discourse regarding the timing of its legal effects, whether for the 2024 or 2029 General Election (Pemilu). According to the Purcell Principle, courts should not rule on cases once the election process has begun. This study aims to answer two questions: (a) How compatible is the Purcell Principle with MK’s authority in judicial review? (b) How has MK initiated the application of the Purcell Principle in judicial review of election-related laws during the election stages? This normative juridical study uses relevant secondary data. The findings show that the Purcell Principle is compatible with MK’s judicial review authority since both apply prospective legal effects. MK previously applied the Purcell Principle in Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013. Over time, MK no longer used it, but in Decision Number 116/PUU-XXI/2023, it “applied” the principle by setting conditional constitutionality for the 2029 election.

Jurnal KonstitusiVol. 22(1)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inisiasi Penerapan Purcell Principle oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terkait Pemilihan Umum — Dian Agung Wicaksono, Garuda Era Ruhpinesthi · Jurnal Konstitusi (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS