The Ghosts of Fleet Street: What Did Not Working Mean in the British Printing Industry, C.1950–80?

In the second half of the twentieth century, the British printing industry seemed to epitomise the United Kingdom’s status as the sick man of Europe, worn down by changing patterns of consumption, lagging technological modernisation and all-powerful trade unions. Especially the latter were more often than not seen as the problem, not the solution to the industry’s problems. An extravagant set of so-called restrictive practices, critics alleged, was used to hide that print workers were not putting in the work they were paid for while giving them undeserved bonuses that were choking corporate profitability. Print workers and their representatives offered a very different reading, in which the incriminated practices reflected a thoroughly earned privilege to define and distribute waged work. By looking at shop floor practices and conflicts, the article argues that print workers’ defence of non-working intervals articulated a broader vision of their own place in capitalist production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary European History
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0960777325000086
Citations
1
Primary Topic
History of Computing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ghosts of Fleet Street: What Did Not Working Mean in the British Printing Industry, C.1950–80?

Kim Christian Priemel
1 citations
Contemporary European History
History of Computing Technologies
1.69
article

The Ghosts of Fleet Street: What Did Not Working Mean in the British Printing Industry, C.1950–80?

Kim Christian Priemel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the second half of the twentieth century, the British printing industry seemed to epitomise the United Kingdom’s status as the sick man of Europe, worn down by changing patterns of consumption, lagging technological modernisation and all-powerful trade unions. Especially the latter were more often than not seen as the problem, not the solution to the industry’s problems. An extravagant set of so-called restrictive practices, critics alleged, was used to hide that print workers were not putting in the work they were paid for while giving them undeserved bonuses that were choking corporate profitability. Print workers and their representatives offered a very different reading, in which the incriminated practices reflected a thoroughly earned privilege to define and distribute waged work. By looking at shop floor practices and conflicts, the article argues that print workers’ defence of non-working intervals articulated a broader vision of their own place in capitalist production.

Contemporary European HistoryVol. 34(3)
University of Oslo (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
History of Computing Technologies
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Ghosts of Fleet Street: What Did Not Working Mean in the British Printing Industry, C.1950–80? — Kim Christian Priemel · Contemporary European History (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS