Comparative Study on the Development of Latent Fingerprints Using Soot Deposition and Black Fingerprint Powder

The study aids in how effectively black fingerprint powder and soot deposition work to form prints to produces superior ridge clarity and detail a common method is fingerprint powder, but soot deposition is frequently cheap and may use easily accessible materials. Soot deposition might not have as much thorough scientific backing as commercial powders. A methodical investigation offers a scientific foundation for its effectiveness, The present study was conducted to identify which gave well-defined print among these two methods, as a natural byproduct, soot may be less damaging to the environment than some of the synthetic ingredients used in fingerprint powders. Measure the cost efficiency between the soot deposition method and the powdered method. The first approach uses black powder to create fingerprints on a glass surface, whereas the second method uses fire-derived soot. These two techniques have been used to gather and produce a total of 100 samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32628/ijsrst251222638
Primary Topic
Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study on the Development of Latent Fingerprints Using Soot Deposition and Black Fingerprint Powder

C Santhosh, S Keerthi
International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology
Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
article

Comparative Study on the Development of Latent Fingerprints Using Soot Deposition and Black Fingerprint Powder

C Santhosh, S Keerthi
article en

Abstract

The study aids in how effectively black fingerprint powder and soot deposition work to form prints to produces superior ridge clarity and detail a common method is fingerprint powder, but soot deposition is frequently cheap and may use easily accessible materials. Soot deposition might not have as much thorough scientific backing as commercial powders. A methodical investigation offers a scientific foundation for its effectiveness, The present study was conducted to identify which gave well-defined print among these two methods, as a natural byproduct, soot may be less damaging to the environment than some of the synthetic ingredients used in fingerprint powders. Measure the cost efficiency between the soot deposition method and the powdered method. The first approach uses black powder to create fingerprints on a glass surface, whereas the second method uses fire-derived soot. These two techniques have been used to gather and produce a total of 100 samples.

International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and TechnologyVol. 12(2)
Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.