Responsibility For the Crime of Motor Vehicle Theft with Aggravation

In the Criminal Code, thefts of property with sufficient value or significance are governed by Article 363. A strong proof of the elements constituting the crime of theft must begin with proving the primary form of the crime, as the stipulation of the crime of theft is the crime of theft committed in a certain way and under certain circumstances and severe circumstances. committing a theft is a crime. The aim of this research is to understand and analyze the characteristics of aggravated theft and motor vehicle theft as well as understand and analyze the accountability and law enforcement of perpetrators of the crime of aggravated motor vehicle theft. Normative legal research, which is a process of scientific research to seek truth from a normative perspective and based on scientific logic, was employed in this investigation. analytical procedures based on inductive reasoning, moving from a particular instance of a problem to its broader category. Based on the research results, the characteristics of the crime of theft at the Foresthreecoffee Cafe on Tuesday 11 May 2021 at around 15.15 WIB were the crime of theft with aggravation. The crime of theft with aggravation was committed by AR. The object of the theft carried out by suspect AR was a 2016 white Honda Beat motorbike in the name of LFL. That because all the elements of Article 363 paragraph (1) 5 of the Criminal Code have been fulfilled, AR is declared to have been legally and convincingly proven to have committed a criminal act as charged in the single indictment of the Public Prosecutor. The court decided to sentence AR to prison for 1 year and 6 months.