Modelling IRB Risk‐Weighted Assets: Looking Beyond Stress Tests

ABSTRACT We propose an enhanced methodology for modelling forward‐looking projections of banks' credit risk IRB risk‐weighted assets (RWA), a critical component of regulatory capital adequacy ratios. Our approach focuses on granular modelling of the internal risk structure of banks' IRB portfolios, offering more accurate estimations compared to the traditional aggregate‐level methods commonly used by many regulatory stress testing frameworks. This improvement seeks to reduce the risk of significant misestimation of RWA, which can distort solvency measures and mislead perceptions of banks' financial health. Our methodology is straightforward to replicate and applicable to various uses, including not only stress testing but also calibrations of macroprudential tools. We demonstrate the advantages of our approach over traditional methods and apply it to estimate the impact of cyclical credit parameters deterioration on RWA and the corresponding calibration of the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for the Czech banking sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Notes
Published
2025-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.70010
Primary Topic
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling IRB Risk‐Weighted Assets: Looking Beyond Stress Tests

Jiří Panoš, Vojtěch Siuda, Josef Švéda
Economic Notes
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
article

Modelling IRB Risk‐Weighted Assets: Looking Beyond Stress Tests

Jiří Panoš, Vojtěch Siuda, Josef Švéda
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We propose an enhanced methodology for modelling forward‐looking projections of banks' credit risk IRB risk‐weighted assets (RWA), a critical component of regulatory capital adequacy ratios. Our approach focuses on granular modelling of the internal risk structure of banks' IRB portfolios, offering more accurate estimations compared to the traditional aggregate‐level methods commonly used by many regulatory stress testing frameworks. This improvement seeks to reduce the risk of significant misestimation of RWA, which can distort solvency measures and mislead perceptions of banks' financial health. Our methodology is straightforward to replicate and applicable to various uses, including not only stress testing but also calibrations of macroprudential tools. We demonstrate the advantages of our approach over traditional methods and apply it to estimate the impact of cyclical credit parameters deterioration on RWA and the corresponding calibration of the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for the Czech banking sector.

Economic NotesVol. 54(2)
Charles University (CZ), Czech National Bank (CZ), Prague University of Economics and Business (CZ)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.