The Carbon Footprint of Diets with Different Exclusions of Animal-Derived Products: Exploratory Polish Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Analyzing the carbon footprint of diets in various populations is important as it can help identify more sustainable food choices that reduce the overall impact of human activities on ongoing warming of the global climate. This pilot exploratory study analyzed the carbon footprint (measured in kg of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent, eq.) using food diaries collected from Polish individuals with varying levels of animal-derived product exclusion in their diets. <b>Methods:</b> The study employed a food diary method, where participants from four dietary groups (vegan, vegetarian, fish-eater, and meat-eater) recorded all meals and beverages consumed over a 7-day period, including portion sizes and packaging details. These diaries were then analyzed to assess dietary adherence and calculate carbon footprints, utilizing standardized CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent emission data from publicly available databases. <b>Results:</b> The analysis revealed a decreasing trend in the carbon footprint corresponding to the degree of elimination of animal-derived products from the diet (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.0217). The mean daily footprint in the vegan group was 1.38 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq., which was significantly lower than in the vegetarian (2.45), fish-eater (2.72), and meat-eater groups (3.62). For each 1000 kcal, the meat-eater diet generated 39.7, 58.3, and 93.9% more CO<sub>2</sub> eq. than in the case of fish-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans, respectively. Over a week, a group of 10 vegans had a total carbon footprint lower than vegetarians, fish-eaters, and meat-eaters by 42.9, 52.2, and 61.8%, respectively. Hard and mozzarella cheese had the highest contribution to the carbon footprint in vegetarians, fish, and seafood in fish-eaters, and poultry, pork, and beef had the highest contribution in meat-eaters. <b>Conclusions:</b> Dietary carbon footprints vary considerably by dietary pattern, with lower consumption of animal-derived products associated with lower emissions. Additionally, identifying specific high-impact food items within each diet may inform strategies for reducing environmental impact across various eating patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17081377
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Carbon Footprint of Diets with Different Exclusions of Animal-Derived Products: Exploratory Polish Study

Piotr Rzymski, Anna Choręziak
3 citations
Nutrients
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
5.15
article

The Carbon Footprint of Diets with Different Exclusions of Animal-Derived Products: Exploratory Polish Study

Piotr Rzymski, Anna Choręziak
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Analyzing the carbon footprint of diets in various populations is important as it can help identify more sustainable food choices that reduce the overall impact of human activities on ongoing warming of the global climate. This pilot exploratory study analyzed the carbon footprint (measured in kg of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent, eq.) using food diaries collected from Polish individuals with varying levels of animal-derived product exclusion in their diets. <b>Methods:</b> The study employed a food diary method, where participants from four dietary groups (vegan, vegetarian, fish-eater, and meat-eater) recorded all meals and beverages consumed over a 7-day period, including portion sizes and packaging details. These diaries were then analyzed to assess dietary adherence and calculate carbon footprints, utilizing standardized CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent emission data from publicly available databases. <b>Results:</b> The analysis revealed a decreasing trend in the carbon footprint corresponding to the degree of elimination of animal-derived products from the diet (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.0217). The mean daily footprint in the vegan group was 1.38 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq., which was significantly lower than in the vegetarian (2.45), fish-eater (2.72), and meat-eater groups (3.62). For each 1000 kcal, the meat-eater diet generated 39.7, 58.3, and 93.9% more CO<sub>2</sub> eq. than in the case of fish-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans, respectively. Over a week, a group of 10 vegans had a total carbon footprint lower than vegetarians, fish-eaters, and meat-eaters by 42.9, 52.2, and 61.8%, respectively. Hard and mozzarella cheese had the highest contribution to the carbon footprint in vegetarians, fish, and seafood in fish-eaters, and poultry, pork, and beef had the highest contribution in meat-eaters. <b>Conclusions:</b> Dietary carbon footprints vary considerably by dietary pattern, with lower consumption of animal-derived products associated with lower emissions. Additionally, identifying specific high-impact food items within each diet may inform strategies for reducing environmental impact across various eating patterns.

NutrientsVol. 17(8)
Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.