SISTEM PERADILAN ISLAM DI BAWAH WILAYAT AL-FAQIH: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF ANTARA IRAN DAN INDONESIA

This study examines the influence of the Wilayat al-Faqih principle on the Islamic judiciary system in the Islamic Republic of Iran and compares it to the religious court system in Indonesia. The focus is on how Shia Imamiyyah doctrine shapes Iran's legal and judicial structures, including the Supreme Court and Revolutionary Courts, highlighting the strong interplay between religion and politics. Conversely, Indonesia separates religious authority from the state, with its religious courts under the Supreme Court and free from political ideologies. A qualitative descriptive method, based on primary and secondary sources, was employed. The findings reveal that Wilayat al-Faqih grants extensive power to the Supreme Leader over Iran's judiciary, unlike Indonesia's pluralistic legal system. In family law, Iran adopts Shia-based practices, such as mut’ah marriage and lower marriageable ages, while Indonesia has reformed family law to establish higher minimum marriage ages. In conclusion, religious ideology profoundly influences Iran's legal policies, whereas Indonesia offers a more inclusive and pluralistic legal framework.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal AL-MAQASID Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24952/almaqasid.v10i2.14110
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SISTEM PERADILAN ISLAM DI BAWAH WILAYAT AL-FAQIH: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF ANTARA IRAN DAN INDONESIA

Asasriwarni Asasriwarni, Zulfan Zulfan, Rusda Ulfa
Jurnal AL-MAQASID Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan
Legal Studies and Policies
article

SISTEM PERADILAN ISLAM DI BAWAH WILAYAT AL-FAQIH: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF ANTARA IRAN DAN INDONESIA

Asasriwarni Asasriwarni, Zulfan Zulfan, Rusda Ulfa
article en

Abstract

This study examines the influence of the Wilayat al-Faqih principle on the Islamic judiciary system in the Islamic Republic of Iran and compares it to the religious court system in Indonesia. The focus is on how Shia Imamiyyah doctrine shapes Iran's legal and judicial structures, including the Supreme Court and Revolutionary Courts, highlighting the strong interplay between religion and politics. Conversely, Indonesia separates religious authority from the state, with its religious courts under the Supreme Court and free from political ideologies. A qualitative descriptive method, based on primary and secondary sources, was employed. The findings reveal that Wilayat al-Faqih grants extensive power to the Supreme Leader over Iran's judiciary, unlike Indonesia's pluralistic legal system. In family law, Iran adopts Shia-based practices, such as mut’ah marriage and lower marriageable ages, while Indonesia has reformed family law to establish higher minimum marriage ages. In conclusion, religious ideology profoundly influences Iran's legal policies, whereas Indonesia offers a more inclusive and pluralistic legal framework.

Jurnal AL-MAQASID Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan KeperdataanVol. 10(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SISTEM PERADILAN ISLAM DI BAWAH WILAYAT AL-FAQIH: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF ANTARA IRAN DAN INDONESIA — Asasriwarni Asasriwarni, Zulfan Zulfan, et al. · Jurnal AL-MAQASID Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS