Predictive Risk Factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) in Rectal Cancer—An Observational Cohort Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The improved long-term survival of rectal cancer patients has led to a major increase in the prevalence of functional complications. Understanding which patients are prone to develop major LARS is important for their preoperative counselling and follow-up. Herein, we aimed to assess the risk factors for LARS. <b>Methods</b>: This is a retrospective cohort study on rectal cancer patients. All patient and tumour variables, management plan, type of neoadjuvant therapy, radiation dose to anal sphincter, and perioperative outcomes were collected from the hospital electronic databases. We quantified LARS and compared the score before and after surgery (mean follow-up of 42.2 ± 32 months). <b>Results</b>: A total of 182 patients were included for the final analysis. LARS was present in 43.4% (n = 79) of patients, with 14.8% (n = 27) having minor LARS and 28.5% (n = 52) having major LARS. Age (<i>p</i> = 0.03), male gender (<i>p</i> < 0.00001), smoking (<i>p</i> = 0.04), neoadjuvant radiotherapy (<i>p</i> = 0.02), rectal stump length (<i>p</i> = 0.008), end-to-end anastomosis (<i>p</i> = 0.008), and ileostomy (<i>p</i> = 0.002) were found to significantly increase the rate of LARS. A logistic regression model based on the above variables was able to predict major LARS with good predictive value (AUC 0.700). <b>Conclusions</b>: LARS is highly common after sphincter-preserving surgery, and it is significantly more common in young, male patients with a history of smoking, having mid-lower rectal cancers with neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and undergoing TME surgery with end-to-end low anastomosis and ileostomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082831
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Risk Factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) in Rectal Cancer—An Observational Cohort Study

Emanuel Baltig, Sorinel Luncă, Ștefan Morărașu, Gabriel Mihail Dimofte et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
1.05
article

Predictive Risk Factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) in Rectal Cancer—An Observational Cohort Study

Emanuel Baltig, Sorinel Luncă, Ștefan Morărașu, Gabriel Mihail Dimofte, Wee Liam Ong, C. B. Osman, Raluca Zaharia, Mara Răzniceanu, Monica Buzemurgă, Fadi Al Shatarat, Tudor Gramada
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The improved long-term survival of rectal cancer patients has led to a major increase in the prevalence of functional complications. Understanding which patients are prone to develop major LARS is important for their preoperative counselling and follow-up. Herein, we aimed to assess the risk factors for LARS. <b>Methods</b>: This is a retrospective cohort study on rectal cancer patients. All patient and tumour variables, management plan, type of neoadjuvant therapy, radiation dose to anal sphincter, and perioperative outcomes were collected from the hospital electronic databases. We quantified LARS and compared the score before and after surgery (mean follow-up of 42.2 ± 32 months). <b>Results</b>: A total of 182 patients were included for the final analysis. LARS was present in 43.4% (n = 79) of patients, with 14.8% (n = 27) having minor LARS and 28.5% (n = 52) having major LARS. Age (<i>p</i> = 0.03), male gender (<i>p</i> < 0.00001), smoking (<i>p</i> = 0.04), neoadjuvant radiotherapy (<i>p</i> = 0.02), rectal stump length (<i>p</i> = 0.008), end-to-end anastomosis (<i>p</i> = 0.008), and ileostomy (<i>p</i> = 0.002) were found to significantly increase the rate of LARS. A logistic regression model based on the above variables was able to predict major LARS with good predictive value (AUC 0.700). <b>Conclusions</b>: LARS is highly common after sphincter-preserving surgery, and it is significantly more common in young, male patients with a history of smoking, having mid-lower rectal cancers with neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and undergoing TME surgery with end-to-end low anastomosis and ileostomy.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(8)
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Institutul Regional de Oncologie (RO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.