Reconstruction of the Characteristics of the Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Minimum Age of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates in the Republic Of Indonesia’s State Administrative System

There was a proposal that the minimum age of Indonesia’s Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates should be 35 years as opposed to the original 40 years. Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 on the Minimum Age of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates rejected this proposal and declared that the minimum age is 40 years old with an additional sentence of "having had experience as a head of a region". This paper aims to analyze how Constitutional Court judges reconstruct the characteristics of the Constitutional Court decision in interpreting case No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 and the considerations of Constitutional Court judges in applying legal regulation principles in deciding upon case No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Results found that The Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 is unconstitutional as it violates the mandate of the 1945 Constitution and Article 169 letter (q) of Law No. 7 of 2017 on the General Election.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Published
2024-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2024.24.3.15571
Primary Topic
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstruction of the Characteristics of the Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Minimum Age of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates in the Republic Of Indonesia’s State Administrative System

Mahesa Rannie, Dewi Iriani, Muhammad Fauzan, Arief Budiono et al.
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
article

Reconstruction of the Characteristics of the Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Minimum Age of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates in the Republic Of Indonesia’s State Administrative System

Mahesa Rannie, Dewi Iriani, Muhammad Fauzan, Arief Budiono, Elsa Sintya Marvinda
article en

Abstract

There was a proposal that the minimum age of Indonesia’s Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates should be 35 years as opposed to the original 40 years. Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 on the Minimum Age of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates rejected this proposal and declared that the minimum age is 40 years old with an additional sentence of "having had experience as a head of a region". This paper aims to analyze how Constitutional Court judges reconstruct the characteristics of the Constitutional Court decision in interpreting case No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 and the considerations of Constitutional Court judges in applying legal regulation principles in deciding upon case No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Results found that The Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 is unconstitutional as it violates the mandate of the 1945 Constitution and Article 169 letter (q) of Law No. 7 of 2017 on the General Election.

Jurnal Dinamika HukumVol. 24(3)
Jenderal Soedirman University (ID), Sriwijaya University (ID), Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta (ID), Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.