A Quantitative Legal Support System for Transnational Autonomous Vehicle Design

One of the key expectations of AI product manufacturers for their products is the ability to scale to larger markets, especially across legal systems, with fewer prototypes and lower adaptation costs. This paper focuses on the increasingly dynamic legal compliance challenges faced by designers of AI products in achieving this goal. Based on non-monotonic reasoning, we design an automated reasoning tool to help them better understand the legal implications of their designs in a transnational context and, ultimately, adjust the design of AI products more flexibly. This tool supports the quantitative representation of the strength of legal significance to help designers better understand the reasons for their decisions from their own perspective. To illustrate this functionality, a case study on traffic regulations across the UK, France, and Japan demonstrates the system’s ability to resolve legal conflicts—such as driving-side mandates and speed radar detector prohibitions—through quantitative evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drones
Published
2025-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040316
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Quantitative Legal Support System for Transnational Autonomous Vehicle Design

Zhe Yu, Zongshun Wang, Hao Zhan, Yang Yu et al.
2 citations
Drones
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
4.96
article

A Quantitative Legal Support System for Transnational Autonomous Vehicle Design

Zhe Yu, Zongshun Wang, Hao Zhan, Yang Yu, Yiwei Lu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

One of the key expectations of AI product manufacturers for their products is the ability to scale to larger markets, especially across legal systems, with fewer prototypes and lower adaptation costs. This paper focuses on the increasingly dynamic legal compliance challenges faced by designers of AI products in achieving this goal. Based on non-monotonic reasoning, we design an automated reasoning tool to help them better understand the legal implications of their designs in a transnational context and, ultimately, adjust the design of AI products more flexibly. This tool supports the quantitative representation of the strength of legal significance to help designers better understand the reasons for their decisions from their own perspective. To illustrate this functionality, a case study on traffic regulations across the UK, France, and Japan demonstrates the system’s ability to resolve legal conflicts—such as driving-side mandates and speed radar detector prohibitions—through quantitative evaluation.

DronesVol. 9(4)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Xiamen University (CN), Beijing Jiaotong University (CN), University of Edinburgh (GB)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.