Silos and Sustainability: How the Permeability of Organizational Boundaries Shapes Corporate Sustainability Integration

ABSTRACT The aim of this study is to examine how the permeability of organizational boundaries shapes corporate sustainability (CS) integration. The literature suggests that CS should be integrated throughout the organization and in its relationships with key, external stakeholders, but limited knowledge exists on the relationship between CS integration and the characteristics of the multiple, co‐existing boundaries which define the organization (hierarchies, functions, professions, etc.). Based on a partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM) analysis of survey responses from over 7000 organization members in three Nordic countries (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden), this study demonstrates that the permeability of organizational boundaries increases the level of CS integration and reduces the level of organizational tensions. Moreover, the findings show that boundary permeability becomes increasingly important for understanding CS integration as the size of the organization increases. The findings deepen our knowledge of organizational boundaries and show how these “sites of difference” influence the level of CS integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2025-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4302
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Silos and Sustainability: How the Permeability of Organizational Boundaries Shapes Corporate Sustainability Integration

Francesco Rosati, Armando Calabrese, Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen, Roberta Costa et al.
1 citations
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Silos and Sustainability: How the Permeability of Organizational Boundaries Shapes Corporate Sustainability Integration

Francesco Rosati, Armando Calabrese, Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen, Roberta Costa, Luigi Tiburzi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this study is to examine how the permeability of organizational boundaries shapes corporate sustainability (CS) integration. The literature suggests that CS should be integrated throughout the organization and in its relationships with key, external stakeholders, but limited knowledge exists on the relationship between CS integration and the characteristics of the multiple, co‐existing boundaries which define the organization (hierarchies, functions, professions, etc.). Based on a partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM) analysis of survey responses from over 7000 organization members in three Nordic countries (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden), this study demonstrates that the permeability of organizational boundaries increases the level of CS integration and reduces the level of organizational tensions. Moreover, the findings show that boundary permeability becomes increasingly important for understanding CS integration as the size of the organization increases. The findings deepen our knowledge of organizational boundaries and show how these “sites of difference” influence the level of CS integration.

Business Strategy and the EnvironmentVol. 34(5)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.