The Right Answer for the Wrong Reason: Preservice Science and Mathematics Teacher Preferences and Explanations of Inquiry-Based Teaching

Inquiry in science and mathematics education has a long and established history within the student-centered teaching movement because it can positively impact student learning, retention, and engagement. Yet few teachers have embraced these practices in the classroom. Potential reasons include misalignment of teachers’ attitudes about inquiry and a lack of understanding of what inquiry is and how to implement it in the classroom. This mixed-methods study compares these claims by examining preservice teachers’ attitudes and knowledge about inquiry-based teaching. Eighty-seven discussion posts were analyzed on preservice science and math teachers’ preferences for inquiry-based versus teacher-centered instruction at the beginning and end of their introductory methods course. While the novice science and math preservice teachers in this study overwhelmingly claimed to prefer inquiry-based instruction to teacher-centered, few were able to identify and articulate features specific to inquiry when asked to explain their preference. Most preservice teachers described other student-centered strategies, such as collaboration and active learning, or general teaching strategies, such as questioning, hands-on activities, and creating a fun and engaging environment. Implications and suggestions for the field are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Science Mathematics and Technology Education
Published
2025-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.411si
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Right Answer for the Wrong Reason: Preservice Science and Mathematics Teacher Preferences and Explanations of Inquiry-Based Teaching

Elizabeth R. Goldberg, Taylor Darwin
1 citations
Journal of Research in Science Mathematics and Technology Education
Science Education and Pedagogy
8.93
article

The Right Answer for the Wrong Reason: Preservice Science and Mathematics Teacher Preferences and Explanations of Inquiry-Based Teaching

Elizabeth R. Goldberg, Taylor Darwin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Inquiry in science and mathematics education has a long and established history within the student-centered teaching movement because it can positively impact student learning, retention, and engagement. Yet few teachers have embraced these practices in the classroom. Potential reasons include misalignment of teachers’ attitudes about inquiry and a lack of understanding of what inquiry is and how to implement it in the classroom. This mixed-methods study compares these claims by examining preservice teachers’ attitudes and knowledge about inquiry-based teaching. Eighty-seven discussion posts were analyzed on preservice science and math teachers’ preferences for inquiry-based versus teacher-centered instruction at the beginning and end of their introductory methods course. While the novice science and math preservice teachers in this study overwhelmingly claimed to prefer inquiry-based instruction to teacher-centered, few were able to identify and articulate features specific to inquiry when asked to explain their preference. Most preservice teachers described other student-centered strategies, such as collaboration and active learning, or general teaching strategies, such as questioning, hands-on activities, and creating a fun and engaging environment. Implications and suggestions for the field are discussed.

Journal of Research in Science Mathematics and Technology Education
Texas Tech University (US), The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Science Education and Pedagogy
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.