The Human Rights Dimension of Creditors’ Position in Enforcement and Insolvency Procedures: Lessons to Be Learned From ECtHR Case Law

Abstract The protection of creditors’ human rights and procedural guarantees is important and necessary in both enforcement and insolvency procedures. They are guaranteed in national constitutions and international treaties, in particular the European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The purpose of this paper is to compare the position of the creditor in both types of procedures from a human rights perspective. In particular, it focuses on the procedural right to a fair trial (Article 6) and the substantive right to peaceful enjoyment of one’s possessions (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) as understood by the European Court of Human Rights. The article critically analyses its relevant case law, which, by interpreting both rights, defines the limits of national rules on enforcement and insolvency procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Danube
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2025-0001
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Human Rights Dimension of Creditors’ Position in Enforcement and Insolvency Procedures: Lessons to Be Learned From ECtHR Case Law

Karmen Lutman, Neža Pogorelčnik Vogrinc
Danube
Corporate Governance and Law
article

The Human Rights Dimension of Creditors’ Position in Enforcement and Insolvency Procedures: Lessons to Be Learned From ECtHR Case Law

Karmen Lutman, Neža Pogorelčnik Vogrinc
article en

Abstract

Abstract The protection of creditors’ human rights and procedural guarantees is important and necessary in both enforcement and insolvency procedures. They are guaranteed in national constitutions and international treaties, in particular the European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The purpose of this paper is to compare the position of the creditor in both types of procedures from a human rights perspective. In particular, it focuses on the procedural right to a fair trial (Article 6) and the substantive right to peaceful enjoyment of one’s possessions (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) as understood by the European Court of Human Rights. The article critically analyses its relevant case law, which, by interpreting both rights, defines the limits of national rules on enforcement and insolvency procedures.

DanubeVol. 16(1)
University of Ljubljana (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Corporate Governance and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.