Toward More Equitable Instruction: How Teachers Integrate Ambitious, Traditional, and Culturally Responsive Mathematics Practices

Increasingly, there is consensus that equitable mathematics instruction incorporates ambitious and culturally responsive (CR) practices. Using self-reported survey data and mixture modeling, we examine teachers’ emphasis on ambitious, traditional, and CR mathematics practices. We offer an emergent typology for characterizing teacher engagement with CR teaching in mathematics. One-half of teachers—predominantly White and experienced—reported rarely engaging in CR practices, focusing exclusively on a mix of ambitious and traditional practices. One-third of teachers emphasized some CR practices alongside ambitious and traditional practices. Less than one-quarter of teachers—predominantly teachers of color—emphasized ambitious mathematics and a robust set of CR practices. Teachers who de-emphasize CR teaching reported believing in it but having low self-efficacy. We offer implications for policy and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AERA Open
Published
2025-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251331463
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward More Equitable Instruction: How Teachers Integrate Ambitious, Traditional, and Culturally Responsive Mathematics Practices

Kenneth Shores, Kirsten Lee Hill, Camila Polanco, Meghan Comstock et al.
4 citations
AERA Open
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
35.70
article

Toward More Equitable Instruction: How Teachers Integrate Ambitious, Traditional, and Culturally Responsive Mathematics Practices

Kenneth Shores, Kirsten Lee Hill, Camila Polanco, Meghan Comstock, Laura M. Desimone, Erica Litke
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Increasingly, there is consensus that equitable mathematics instruction incorporates ambitious and culturally responsive (CR) practices. Using self-reported survey data and mixture modeling, we examine teachers’ emphasis on ambitious, traditional, and CR mathematics practices. We offer an emergent typology for characterizing teacher engagement with CR teaching in mathematics. One-half of teachers—predominantly White and experienced—reported rarely engaging in CR practices, focusing exclusively on a mix of ambitious and traditional practices. One-third of teachers emphasized some CR practices alongside ambitious and traditional practices. Less than one-quarter of teachers—predominantly teachers of color—emphasized ambitious mathematics and a robust set of CR practices. Teachers who de-emphasize CR teaching reported believing in it but having low self-efficacy. We offer implications for policy and practice.

AERA OpenVol. 11
University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of Delaware (US)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Institute of Education Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
35.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.