Payment forms linked to consumer preferences for promotional offers: mediating and moderating factors

Purpose This research examines the relationship between payment forms (cash vs credit card) and consumer promotional offer preferences (price discounts vs bonus packs). It also tests the indirect effects of different valuations (based on calculating or feeling) on this relationship and the moderating effects of self-constructs and individual differences in sensitivity to paying. Design/methodology/approach Three studies were conducted to test the proposed hypotheses. Study 1 examines preferences for price discounts vs bonus packs under cash and credit payment conditions (i.e. the relationship between payment form and promotional offer preference). Based on Study 1, Study 2 examines the mediating effects of valuation (by calculation or feeling) on that relationship. Study 3 tests the moderating effect of self-constructs and individual differences on the relationship. Findings Cash users prefer price discounts when primed with a calculating valuation, while credit card users prefer bonus packs when primed with a feeling valuation. In addition, we find that the relationship between payment forms and promotional offer preference is moderated by self-construct (independent vs interdependent) and individual differences in sensitivity to paying (tightwads vs spendthrifts). Research limitations/implications Different payment methods affect consumers’ valuation processes. Marketing professionals must understand the relationship between payment forms and particular offer preferences to formulate the right strategy. In addition, it is necessary for future studies on the social impact resulting from the population of fintech use, particularly the potential to trap the young and those economically disadvantaged at risk of indebtedness due to the low adoption barrier of technology-based cashless payment forms. Originality/value Rapid innovations in payment forms have increased consumers’ choices, influencing their future behaviour. However, few studies have examined how consumer valuation processes vary concerning different payment forms. This study highlights the importance of promoting awareness of consumer information processing and offers theoretical and practical implications regarding the use of payment forms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Bank Marketing
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-06-2024-0378
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Payment forms linked to consumer preferences for promotional offers: mediating and moderating factors

Yin‐Hui Cheng, Shih‐Chieh Chuang, Molly Chien-Jung Huang, Jia-Huei Hou
3 citations
International Journal of Bank Marketing
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
6.22
article

Payment forms linked to consumer preferences for promotional offers: mediating and moderating factors

Yin‐Hui Cheng, Shih‐Chieh Chuang, Molly Chien-Jung Huang, Jia-Huei Hou
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose This research examines the relationship between payment forms (cash vs credit card) and consumer promotional offer preferences (price discounts vs bonus packs). It also tests the indirect effects of different valuations (based on calculating or feeling) on this relationship and the moderating effects of self-constructs and individual differences in sensitivity to paying. Design/methodology/approach Three studies were conducted to test the proposed hypotheses. Study 1 examines preferences for price discounts vs bonus packs under cash and credit payment conditions (i.e. the relationship between payment form and promotional offer preference). Based on Study 1, Study 2 examines the mediating effects of valuation (by calculation or feeling) on that relationship. Study 3 tests the moderating effect of self-constructs and individual differences on the relationship. Findings Cash users prefer price discounts when primed with a calculating valuation, while credit card users prefer bonus packs when primed with a feeling valuation. In addition, we find that the relationship between payment forms and promotional offer preference is moderated by self-construct (independent vs interdependent) and individual differences in sensitivity to paying (tightwads vs spendthrifts). Research limitations/implications Different payment methods affect consumers’ valuation processes. Marketing professionals must understand the relationship between payment forms and particular offer preferences to formulate the right strategy. In addition, it is necessary for future studies on the social impact resulting from the population of fintech use, particularly the potential to trap the young and those economically disadvantaged at risk of indebtedness due to the low adoption barrier of technology-based cashless payment forms. Originality/value Rapid innovations in payment forms have increased consumers’ choices, influencing their future behaviour. However, few studies have examined how consumer valuation processes vary concerning different payment forms. This study highlights the importance of promoting awareness of consumer information processing and offers theoretical and practical implications regarding the use of payment forms.

International Journal of Bank MarketingVol. 43(8)
National Chung Cheng University (TW), Aletheia University (TW), National Taichung University of Education (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
6.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.