PANDANGAN ULAMA ACEH TERHADAP HUKUMAN CAMBUK DI PENJARA

In 2018 the Governor of Aceh issued Pergub Aceh No. 5 of 2018. The case became a controversy in the community because one of its rules stated that whipping was carried out in prison. The pergub became a discussion of the community, not except the ulema. Therefore, the author was interested in compequesting the Aceh ulema view of the punishment of whipping in prison. The results showed that dayah ulema more agreed that whipping punishment is done in public places because it is considered to have run well, easily accessible to the public, and more effective for learning. While there are campus ulema who agree that whipping is carried out in prison because it is considered not contrary to Islamic law, more controlled, and more politically correct, but there are also campus ulema who do not agree because it is considered to eliminate the value of learning for the community. The difference arises because of different points of view; clerics who do not agree the punishment of whipping is carried out in prison more see the effectiveness, while the clerics who agree to see normatively and politically.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Qonuni Jurnal Hukum dan Pengkajian Islam
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59833/jqdt7848
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PANDANGAN ULAMA ACEH TERHADAP HUKUMAN CAMBUK DI PENJARA

Darul Faizin
Qonuni Jurnal Hukum dan Pengkajian Islam
Legal Studies and Policies
article

PANDANGAN ULAMA ACEH TERHADAP HUKUMAN CAMBUK DI PENJARA

Darul Faizin
article en

Abstract

In 2018 the Governor of Aceh issued Pergub Aceh No. 5 of 2018. The case became a controversy in the community because one of its rules stated that whipping was carried out in prison. The pergub became a discussion of the community, not except the ulema. Therefore, the author was interested in compequesting the Aceh ulema view of the punishment of whipping in prison. The results showed that dayah ulema more agreed that whipping punishment is done in public places because it is considered to have run well, easily accessible to the public, and more effective for learning. While there are campus ulema who agree that whipping is carried out in prison because it is considered not contrary to Islamic law, more controlled, and more politically correct, but there are also campus ulema who do not agree because it is considered to eliminate the value of learning for the community. The difference arises because of different points of view; clerics who do not agree the punishment of whipping is carried out in prison more see the effectiveness, while the clerics who agree to see normatively and politically.

Qonuni Jurnal Hukum dan Pengkajian IslamVol. 1(02)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PANDANGAN ULAMA ACEH TERHADAP HUKUMAN CAMBUK DI PENJARA — Darul Faizin · Qonuni Jurnal Hukum dan Pengkajian Islam (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS