The Power to Tax, The Second Amendment, and the Search for Which "'Gangster' Weapons" to Tax

Congress does not have the power to ban firearms. The National Firearms Act (NFA) is based on the power of Congress to lay and collect taxes. In 1937, the Supreme Court upheld the NFA as purely a revenue measure. When it banned possession of machineguns in 1986, Congress undercut that constitutional basis. The Supreme Court has held that any ambiguities in the NFA must be read narrowly according to the rule of lenity. The 1934 House hearings barely mentioned the Second Amendment. A federal district judge upheld the NFA under the theory that the Second Amendment does not protect individual rights. In 1939, the Supreme Court declined to take judicial notice that a short-barreled shotgun is “ordinary military ordnance” protected under the Second Amendment. Recently, the Court has adopted the test that the Second Amendment protects arms that are in common use. The initial NFA bill, and the bill as enacted, arbitrarily included some firearms and excluded others. After enactment, the Attorney General went on a failed crusade to require all firearms to be registered. Short-barreled rifles and silencers should be removed from the NFA. Neither was identified in the 1934 hearings as desirable to criminals. Today, registered short-barreled rifles and silencers are in common use and are rarely used in crime. Removing them from the NFA would leave them still regulated under the Gun Control Act.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Wyoming Law Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59643/1942-9916.1515
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Power to Tax, The Second Amendment, and the Search for Which "'Gangster' Weapons" to Tax

Stephen P. Halbrook
Wyoming Law Review
Taxation and Compliance Studies
article

The Power to Tax, The Second Amendment, and the Search for Which "'Gangster' Weapons" to Tax

Stephen P. Halbrook
article en

Abstract

Congress does not have the power to ban firearms. The National Firearms Act (NFA) is based on the power of Congress to lay and collect taxes. In 1937, the Supreme Court upheld the NFA as purely a revenue measure. When it banned possession of machineguns in 1986, Congress undercut that constitutional basis. The Supreme Court has held that any ambiguities in the NFA must be read narrowly according to the rule of lenity. The 1934 House hearings barely mentioned the Second Amendment. A federal district judge upheld the NFA under the theory that the Second Amendment does not protect individual rights. In 1939, the Supreme Court declined to take judicial notice that a short-barreled shotgun is “ordinary military ordnance” protected under the Second Amendment. Recently, the Court has adopted the test that the Second Amendment protects arms that are in common use. The initial NFA bill, and the bill as enacted, arbitrarily included some firearms and excluded others. After enactment, the Attorney General went on a failed crusade to require all firearms to be registered. Short-barreled rifles and silencers should be removed from the NFA. Neither was identified in the 1934 hearings as desirable to criminals. Today, registered short-barreled rifles and silencers are in common use and are rarely used in crime. Removing them from the NFA would leave them still regulated under the Gun Control Act.

Wyoming Law ReviewVol. 25(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.