Comparisons on the evaluation methods of chlorine resistance fungi in drinking water

Chlorine disinfection is fundamental for ensuring microbial safety in drinking water systems. However, fungi pose significant pathogenic risks due to their substantially higher chlorine resistance compared to bacteria. Existing approaches for evaluating fungal chlorine resistance face challenges, including the absence of standardized protocols, labor-intensive procedures, prolonged experimental durations, and limited real-time detection capabilities. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying fungal chlorine resistance remain inadequately understood. This study provides a comprehensive and systematic comparison of the primary methods used to assess fungal chlorine resistance, including log reduction, concentration-time (CT) values, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The CT value method incorporates disinfectant decay, contact time, and experimental conditions to reflect the dynamics of the disinfection process. In contrast, the log reduction method focuses on endpoint inactivation, while MIC provides a retrospective evaluation. Therefore, the CT method is recommended as the most effective method. This study investigates the underlying mechanisms of fungal chlorine resistance, emphasizing the critical roles played by fungal cell wall components, such as melanin and chitosan, the antioxidant enzyme systems, and the formation of biofilms in conferring enhanced resistance to chlorine exposure. The findings provide a theoretical foundation for the development of standardized methods and more effective strategies for controlling fungal contamination in water treatment process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.121650
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water Treatment and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparisons on the evaluation methods of chlorine resistance fungi in drinking water

Qiqi Wan, Gang Wen, Jingyi Wang, Yihan Wang et al.
1 citations
Environmental Research
Water Treatment and Disinfection
1.20
article

Comparisons on the evaluation methods of chlorine resistance fungi in drinking water

Qiqi Wan, Gang Wen, Jingyi Wang, Yihan Wang, Gehui Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Chlorine disinfection is fundamental for ensuring microbial safety in drinking water systems. However, fungi pose significant pathogenic risks due to their substantially higher chlorine resistance compared to bacteria. Existing approaches for evaluating fungal chlorine resistance face challenges, including the absence of standardized protocols, labor-intensive procedures, prolonged experimental durations, and limited real-time detection capabilities. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying fungal chlorine resistance remain inadequately understood. This study provides a comprehensive and systematic comparison of the primary methods used to assess fungal chlorine resistance, including log reduction, concentration-time (CT) values, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The CT value method incorporates disinfectant decay, contact time, and experimental conditions to reflect the dynamics of the disinfection process. In contrast, the log reduction method focuses on endpoint inactivation, while MIC provides a retrospective evaluation. Therefore, the CT method is recommended as the most effective method. This study investigates the underlying mechanisms of fungal chlorine resistance, emphasizing the critical roles played by fungal cell wall components, such as melanin and chitosan, the antioxidant enzyme systems, and the formation of biofilms in conferring enhanced resistance to chlorine exposure. The findings provide a theoretical foundation for the development of standardized methods and more effective strategies for controlling fungal contamination in water treatment process.

Environmental ResearchVol. 278
Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Water Treatment and Disinfection
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparisons on the evaluation methods of chlorine resistance fungi in drinking water — Qiqi Wan, Gang Wen, et al. · Environmental Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS