Individual Discrimination Within, but Not Between, Two Vocalization Types of the Black‐Capped Chickadee

ABSTRACT Many songbird species use individual vocal recognition in their social behaviors. Researchers commonly use individual discrimination tasks, such as operant conditioning Go/No‐go tasks, to assess individual vocal recognition. Several black‐capped chickadee ( Poecile atricapillus ) vocalizations contain individually distinct features which may be used for individual discrimination. However, not all such vocalizations have been tested for individual recognition with live birds. Additionally, cross vocalization generalization of learned individual discrimination has not been tested. Such generalizability would be advantageous for chickadees, as chickadees often communicate outside of visual contact and use vocal communication to guide their social interactions. Here we test whether black‐capped chickadees can discern individual identity of callers in black‐capped chickadee chick‐a‐dee calls. We also aim to answer whether chickadees can generalize learned individual discrimination using chick‐a‐dee calls to fee‐bee songs, and vice versa. Black‐capped chickadees were trained to discriminate several chick‐a‐dee calls or fee‐bee songs produced by one male and one female chickadee from those produced by a different male and female in an operant conditioning Go/No‐go experiment. We then tested for generalization across vocalization types by presenting birds with recordings from the same four individuals, this time of the opposing vocalization type. Chickadees were able to discriminate between individuals using either chick‐a‐dee calls or fee‐bee songs but were unable to generalize this learning to the opposing vocalization type. While our findings suggest that chickadees can employ individual discrimination within at least two vocalization types, the mechanism by which songs and calls are recognized as belonging to the same individual remains unclear. External contextual cues may play an important role in bridging identity information across those vocalization types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethology
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.13572
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual Discrimination Within, but Not Between, Two Vocalization Types of the Black‐Capped Chickadee

Andrés Camacho‐Alpízar, Sarah M L Smeltz, Carolina Montenegro, Moriah J Deimeke et al.
Ethology
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
article

Individual Discrimination Within, but Not Between, Two Vocalization Types of the Black‐Capped Chickadee

Andrés Camacho‐Alpízar, Sarah M L Smeltz, Carolina Montenegro, Moriah J Deimeke, Christopher B. Sturdy, Katharine Stenstrom, Prateek K. Sahu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many songbird species use individual vocal recognition in their social behaviors. Researchers commonly use individual discrimination tasks, such as operant conditioning Go/No‐go tasks, to assess individual vocal recognition. Several black‐capped chickadee ( Poecile atricapillus ) vocalizations contain individually distinct features which may be used for individual discrimination. However, not all such vocalizations have been tested for individual recognition with live birds. Additionally, cross vocalization generalization of learned individual discrimination has not been tested. Such generalizability would be advantageous for chickadees, as chickadees often communicate outside of visual contact and use vocal communication to guide their social interactions. Here we test whether black‐capped chickadees can discern individual identity of callers in black‐capped chickadee chick‐a‐dee calls. We also aim to answer whether chickadees can generalize learned individual discrimination using chick‐a‐dee calls to fee‐bee songs, and vice versa. Black‐capped chickadees were trained to discriminate several chick‐a‐dee calls or fee‐bee songs produced by one male and one female chickadee from those produced by a different male and female in an operant conditioning Go/No‐go experiment. We then tested for generalization across vocalization types by presenting birds with recordings from the same four individuals, this time of the opposing vocalization type. Chickadees were able to discriminate between individuals using either chick‐a‐dee calls or fee‐bee songs but were unable to generalize this learning to the opposing vocalization type. While our findings suggest that chickadees can employ individual discrimination within at least two vocalization types, the mechanism by which songs and calls are recognized as belonging to the same individual remains unclear. External contextual cues may play an important role in bridging identity information across those vocalization types.

EthologyVol. 131(8)
University of Alberta (CA), Women and Children’s Health Research Institute (CA)
University of Alberta, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Canada Research Chairs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.