Global History and the Measures of Early Modern Technology: Europe, East Asia, and the Case of Smoothbore Ballistics

Abstract: Recent scholarship on the “rise of the West” has expanded in scope to military matters. On one side, traditionalists argue that Europe experienced more sustained innovations in “gunpowder technologies.” On the other, revisionists refute that developed areas of Eurasia—especially East Asia—were just as capable of deploying the same technologies. Valuable as the debate is, it has been waged without properly understanding the historical context of early modern technologies. This article draws on the history of technology and recognizes the “interpretive flexibility” of guns and ballistics science. First, it challenges existing comparative, quantitative indices of technological “productivity” by showing contextual differences in firearms use and production. By understanding that difference, which highlights in East Asia the possibility of marksmanship with smoothbore muskets, it further revises existing assumptions about the limits of early modern technology, which were based on European data and anachronistic analyses of nineteenth-century ballistics science.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of world history
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2025.a957972
Primary Topic
Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global History and the Measures of Early Modern Technology: Europe, East Asia, and the Case of Smoothbore Ballistics

Hyeok Hweon Kang
Journal of world history
Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
article

Global History and the Measures of Early Modern Technology: Europe, East Asia, and the Case of Smoothbore Ballistics

Hyeok Hweon Kang
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Recent scholarship on the “rise of the West” has expanded in scope to military matters. On one side, traditionalists argue that Europe experienced more sustained innovations in “gunpowder technologies.” On the other, revisionists refute that developed areas of Eurasia—especially East Asia—were just as capable of deploying the same technologies. Valuable as the debate is, it has been waged without properly understanding the historical context of early modern technologies. This article draws on the history of technology and recognizes the “interpretive flexibility” of guns and ballistics science. First, it challenges existing comparative, quantitative indices of technological “productivity” by showing contextual differences in firearms use and production. By understanding that difference, which highlights in East Asia the possibility of marksmanship with smoothbore muskets, it further revises existing assumptions about the limits of early modern technology, which were based on European data and anachronistic analyses of nineteenth-century ballistics science.

Journal of world historyVol. 36(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.